Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):296-303. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01296.
The minimal clinically important difference is the smallest difference in an outcome score that a patient perceives as beneficial. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score for patients treated nonoperatively for rotator cuff disease.
Eighty-one patients with tendinitis or a tear of the rotator cuff were treated with nonoperative modalities. Evaluation with the ASES score and the SST was performed at baseline and at a minimum of six weeks after treatment. At the follow-up evaluation, the minimal clinically important difference was estimated for the two scores with use of an anchor-based approach involving fifteen-item (pain and function) and four-item improvement questions.
The fifteen-item function and four-item assessments indicated, respectively, that a 2.05-point (p = 0.02) and 2.33-point (p = 0.0009) change in the SST score from baseline represented a minimal clinically important difference. The fifteen-item function, fifteen-item pain, and four-item assessments indicated that a 12.01-point (p = 0.03), 16.92-point (p = 0.004), and 16.72-point (p < 0.0001) change in the ASES score from baseline represented a minimal clinically important difference. Age, sex, initial baseline scores, and hand dominance had no effect on the minimal clinically important differences (p > 0.05). A longer duration of follow-up after treatment was associated with a greater minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score (p < 0.05), although the duration of follow-up had no effect on the minimal clinically important difference in the SST score.
Patients with rotator cuff disease who are treated without surgery and have a 2-point change in the SST score or a 12 to 17-point change in the ASES score experience a clinically important change in self-assessed outcome. These minimal clinically important differences can provide the basis for determining if significant differences in outcomes after treatment are clinically relevant.
最小临床重要差异是患者认为有益的结局评分的最小差异。本研究的目的是确定接受非手术治疗的肩袖疾病患者的美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分和简易肩部测试(SST)评分的最小临床重要差异。
81 例肩袖肌腱炎或撕裂患者接受非手术治疗。在基线和治疗后至少 6 周时进行 ASES 评分和 SST 评估。在随访评估中,使用基于锚定的方法,通过十五项(疼痛和功能)和四项改善问题,估计了两种评分的最小临床重要差异。
十五项功能和四项评估分别表明,SST 评分从基线开始变化 2.05 分(p = 0.02)和 2.33 分(p = 0.0009)表示最小临床重要差异。十五项功能、十五项疼痛和四项评估表明,ASES 评分从基线开始变化 12.01 分(p = 0.03)、16.92 分(p = 0.004)和 16.72 分(p < 0.0001)表示最小临床重要差异。年龄、性别、初始基线评分和手优势对最小临床重要差异没有影响(p > 0.05)。治疗后随访时间较长与 ASES 评分的最小临床重要差异更大相关(p < 0.05),尽管随访时间对 SST 评分的最小临床重要差异没有影响。
接受非手术治疗的肩袖疾病患者,SST 评分变化 2 分或 ASES 评分变化 12 至 17 分,自我评估结果发生临床重要变化。这些最小临床重要差异可以为确定治疗后结局的显著差异是否具有临床相关性提供依据。