Pittsburgh, Pa. From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):691-698. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c87b3c.
Unlike traditional plastic surgery patients who present with a specific anatomical complaint, massive weight loss patients often have multiple regions of concern. No single procedure can address the whole-body deformities associated with massive weight loss. The authors sought to quantify their clinical experience to provide evidence-based analysis of procedural combination in body contouring.
Patients were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical database over a 5-year period. Procedure categories included breast, medial thigh lift, buttock and lateral thigh lift, upper back lift, brachioplasty, and abdomen. Analysis of variance was used to analyze differences between procedure combinations.
Six hundred nine massive weight loss patients underwent 661 cases involving 1070 procedures. Length of hospital stay increased with the number of procedures performed (p < 0.001). Second-stage cases (n = 60) had similar complication rates and length of hospital stay. Seroma and dehiscence were strongly correlated with the number of procedures (p < 0.001), as were tissue necrosis and infection (p = 0.02), whereas hematoma was unrelated (p = 0.25). Major complications did not increase in multiple-procedure cases.
In a large experience at a high-volume center, concomitant procedures were performed safely in carefully selected patients with low major complication rates. Although aggregate minor complication rates were predictably higher than in single-procedure cases, there was no significant increase on a per-procedure basis. Multiple procedures can be combined safely in the body contouring patient, with surgical staging offering a viable alternative for patients who are unable to undergo combined procedures.
与传统的整形外科患者有特定的解剖学抱怨不同,大量减重患者通常有多个关注区域。没有单一的手术可以解决与大量减重相关的全身畸形。作者试图通过量化他们的临床经验,为身体轮廓整形手术的程序组合提供基于证据的分析。
在五年的时间里,患者被纳入机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性临床数据库。手术类别包括乳房、内侧大腿提升、臀部和外侧大腿提升、上背部提升、臂成形术和腹部。方差分析用于分析手术组合之间的差异。
609 例大量减重患者接受了 661 例涉及 1070 例手术。手术次数越多,住院时间越长(p<0.001)。二期病例(n=60)的并发症发生率和住院时间相似。血清肿和裂开与手术次数密切相关(p<0.001),组织坏死和感染也与手术次数相关(p=0.02),而血肿与手术次数无关(p=0.25)。多程序病例中未增加严重并发症。
在一个大容量中心的大量经验中,在经过仔细选择的患者中同时进行了伴随手术,这些患者的严重并发症发生率较低。虽然总小并发症发生率高于单一手术病例,但每例手术的发生率没有显著增加。在身体轮廓整形患者中可以安全地组合多个手术,对于无法同时进行联合手术的患者,手术分期提供了一种可行的替代方案。