Suppr超能文献

根据体外封闭时间比较沙格雷酯、阿司匹林和贝前列素在健康志愿者中的抗血小板效力。

Comparison of antiplatelet potency of sarpogrelate, aspirin, and beraprost in healthy volunteers according to in-vitro closure time.

作者信息

Kim Kyung Min, Kim Hyunjung, Chi Hyun-Sook, Park Jung Sik, Kim Soon Bae

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010 Apr;21(3):262-5. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833700fc.

Abstract

This open-label prospective study compared the antiplatelet potency of sarpogrelate, aspirin, and beraprost in 20 healthy volunteers according to in-vitro closure time. Volunteers were assigned to receive sarpogrelate, aspirin, or beraprost for 14 days, then given 14 days of washout, then switched to another of these medications. We measured in-vitro closure time using a platelet function analyzer with collagen/epinephrine (CEPI). We also measured bleeding time, von Willebrand factor (vWF), D-dimer, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and fibrinogen. Baseline parameters were normal in all individuals and were not significantly different among the three groups. In patients who received sarpogrelate, there was no difference in CEPI-closure time at baseline and after 14 days. Aspirin and beraprost significantly prolonged the day 14 CEPI-closure time compared with baseline, from 145 +/- 37 to 259 +/- 41 s (P < 0.0001) and from 134 +/- 37 to 150 +/- 27 s (P = 0.035), respectively. The CEPI-closure time change was greater for aspirin than for beraprost (178 +/- 28 vs. 112 +/- 20%, P < 0.0001). None of the drugs changed the bleeding times of levels of vWF, D-dimer, hs-CRP, and fibrinogen. In conclusion, ingestion of aspirin (100 mg daily) and beraprost (120 microg daily) for 14 days significantly prolonged in-vitro closure time but ingestion of saprogrelate (300 mg daily) for 14 days did not. Aspirin was superior to beraprost in antiplatelet potency, as assessed by in-vitro closure time with CEPI.

摘要

这项开放标签的前瞻性研究,根据体外凝血时间,比较了20名健康志愿者中沙格雷酯、阿司匹林和贝拉前列腺素的抗血小板效力。志愿者被分配接受沙格雷酯、阿司匹林或贝拉前列腺素治疗14天,然后停药14天,接着换用另外一种药物。我们使用含胶原/肾上腺素(CEPI)的血小板功能分析仪测量体外凝血时间。我们还测量了出血时间、血管性血友病因子(vWF)、D-二聚体、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)和纤维蛋白原。所有个体的基线参数均正常,且三组之间无显著差异。接受沙格雷酯治疗的患者,基线时和14天后的CEPI凝血时间无差异。与基线相比,阿司匹林和贝拉前列腺素显著延长了第14天的CEPI凝血时间,分别从145±37秒延长至259±41秒(P<0.0001)和从134±37秒延长至150±27秒(P = 0.035)。阿司匹林的CEPI凝血时间变化大于贝拉前列腺素(178±28%对112±20%,P<0.0001)。这些药物均未改变vWF、D-二聚体、hs-CRP和纤维蛋白原水平的出血时间。总之,服用阿司匹林(每日100毫克)和贝拉前列腺素(每日120微克)14天可显著延长体外凝血时间,但服用沙格雷酯(每日300毫克)14天则无此效果。根据CEPI体外凝血时间评估,阿司匹林的抗血小板效力优于贝拉前列腺素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验