Celgene Corporation, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 2;5(2):e9001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009001.
The cytidine nucleoside analogs azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC) are used for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Few non-clinical studies have directly compared the mechanisms of action of these agents in a head-to-head fashion, and the agents are often viewed as mechanistically similar DNA hypomethylating agents. To better understand the similarities and differences in mechanisms of these drugs, we compared their in vitro effects on several end points in human AML cell lines.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both drugs effected DNA methyltransferase 1 depletion, DNA hypomethylation, and DNA damage induction, with DAC showing equivalent activity at concentrations 2- to 10-fold lower than AZA. At concentrations above 1 microM, AZA had a greater effect than DAC on reducing cell viability. Both drugs increased the sub-G1 fraction and apoptosis markers, with AZA decreasing all cell cycle phases and DAC causing an increase in G2-M. Total protein synthesis was reduced only by AZA, and drug-modulated gene expression profiles were largely non-overlapping.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data demonstrate shared mechanisms of action of AZA and DAC on DNA-mediated markers of activity, but distinctly different effects in their actions on cell viability, protein synthesis, cell cycle, and gene expression. The differential effects of AZA may be mediated by RNA incorporation, as the distribution of AZA in nucleic acid of KG-1a cells was 65:35, RNA:DNA.
胞苷核苷类似物阿扎胞苷(AZA)和地西他滨(DAC)用于治疗骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病(AML)患者。很少有非临床研究以头对头的方式直接比较这些药物的作用机制,而且这些药物通常被视为机制相似的 DNA 去甲基化剂。为了更好地理解这些药物作用机制的异同,我们比较了它们在人 AML 细胞系中的几种终点的体外效应。
方法/主要发现:两种药物均能导致 DNA 甲基转移酶 1 耗竭、DNA 低甲基化和 DNA 损伤诱导,DAC 的活性与 AZA 相比,浓度低 2-10 倍。在 1 μM 以上的浓度下,AZA 对降低细胞活力的作用大于 DAC。两种药物均增加了亚 G1 部分和凋亡标志物,AZA 减少所有细胞周期阶段,DAC 导致 G2-M 增加。只有 AZA 降低总蛋白合成,药物调节的基因表达谱差异很大。
结论/意义:这些数据表明 AZA 和 DAC 在 DNA 介导的活性标记物上具有共同的作用机制,但在细胞活力、蛋白质合成、细胞周期和基因表达方面的作用明显不同。AZA 的差异作用可能通过 RNA 掺入介导,因为 KG-1a 细胞中 AZA 在核酸中的分布为 65:35,RNA:DNA。