Suppr超能文献

2005-06 年金刚烷胺高水平耐药季美国门诊流感诊断后开具的抗病毒处方。

Antiviral prescriptions to U.S. ambulatory care visits with a diagnosis of influenza before and after high level of adamantane resistance 2005-06 season.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Jan 28;5(1):e8945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008945.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid emergence of influenza A viruses resistance to anti-influenza drugs has been observed in the past five years. Our objective was to compare antiviral prescription patterns of ambulatory care providers to patients with a diagnosis of influenza before and after the 2005-2006 influenza season, which was temporally concordant with the emergence of adamantane resistance. We also determined providers' adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2006 interim treatment guidelines for influenza after the dissemination of guidelines.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a multi-year cross-sectional analysis using 2002-2006 data from the national representative ambulatory care surveys, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Our main outcome measure was prescription of any anti-influenza pharmaceutical medication, including amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir, and zanamivir. Analyses were performed using procedures taking into account the multi-stage survey design and weighted sampling probabilities of the data source. Overall, there were 941 visits to U.S. ambulatory care providers for which the diagnosis of influenza was made, representing 12,140,727 visits nationally. Antiviral drugs were prescribed in 21.7% of visits. Even though prescription rates were not significantly different by influenza season (2001-02: 26.4%; 2002-03: 11.2%; 2003-04: 16.5%; 2004-05: 18.0%; 2005-06: 35.8%; 2006-07: 46.5%, p = 0.061), significantly higher prescription rates were observed in the high adamantane resistance period (18.7% versus 37.0%, p = 0.023), and after the announcement of the 2006 guidelines (18.5% versus 38.8%, p = 0.032). Use of adamantanes decreased over time, in that they were commonly used during influenza seasons 2001-03 (60.1%), but used much less frequently during seasons 2003-05 (31.9%), and used rarely after high adamantane resistance emerged (2.2%) (p<0.001). Adherence to 2006 guidelines was 97.7%. After March 2006, no prescriptions for adamantanes were given to patients with a diagnosis of influenza.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In this nationally representative study of U.S. ambulatory care visits, we found a complete absence of the use of adamantanes in all ambulatory care settings after March 2006, closely corresponding to release of the 2006 CDC interim guidelines. Adherence to such practice is an essential element for control and prevention of influenza, especially during the era of emergence of resistance to anti-viral drugs.

摘要

背景

在过去的五年中,观察到甲型流感病毒对抗流感药物的耐药性迅速出现。我们的目的是比较在 2005-2006 年流感季节(与金刚烷胺耐药性的出现时间一致)前后,门诊护理提供者对流感诊断的抗病毒处方模式。在指南发布后,我们还确定了提供者对疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2006 年临时治疗指南的遵循情况。

方法/主要发现:我们使用来自全国代表性的门诊调查,国家门诊医疗调查和国家医院门诊医疗调查的 2002-2006 年数据进行了多年的横断面分析。我们的主要结局指标是开具任何抗流感药物,包括金刚烷胺,金刚烷胺,奥司他韦和扎那米韦。使用考虑到数据来源的多阶段调查设计和加权抽样概率的程序进行了分析。总体而言,有 941 次美国门诊护理提供者就诊,诊断为流感,代表全国 12140727 次就诊。在 21.7%的就诊中开具了抗病毒药物。尽管流感季节的处方率没有显着差异(2001-02:26.4%;2002-03:11.2%;2003-04:16.5%;2004-05:18.0%;2005-06:35.8%;2006-07:46.5%,p=0.061),但在高金刚烷胺耐药期观察到的处方率显着更高(18.7%对 37.0%,p=0.023),并且在宣布 2006 年指南后更高(18.5%对 38.8%,p=0.032)。随着时间的推移,金刚烷胺的使用量逐渐减少,因为它们在 2001-03 流感季节中普遍使用(60.1%),但在 2003-05 季节中使用频率较低(31.9%),并且在金刚烷胺耐药性出现后很少使用(2.2%)(p<0.001)。对 2006 年指南的依从性为 97.7%。2006 年 3 月之后,不再给诊断为流感的患者开具金刚烷胺处方。

结论/意义:在这项针对美国门诊就诊的全国代表性研究中,我们发现 2006 年 3 月之后,所有门诊环境中均完全不再使用金刚烷胺,这与 2006 年 CDC 临时指南的发布密切相关。遵守此类实践是控制和预防流感的重要组成部分,尤其是在抗流感药物耐药性出现的时代。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c6/2812486/f4140cdf3822/pone.0008945.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验