Dentistry Centre, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0367-0. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
Oral posture is considered to have a major influence on the development and reoccurrence of malocclusion. A biofunctional model was tested with the null hypotheses that (1) there are no significant differences between pressures during different oral functions and (2) between pressure measurements in different oral compartments in order to substantiate various postural conditions at rest by intra-oral pressure dynamics. Atmospheric pressure monitoring was simultaneously carried out with a digital manometer in the vestibular inter-occlusal space (IOS) and at the palatal vault (sub-palatal space, SPS). Twenty subjects with normal occlusion were evaluated during the open-mouth condition (OC), gently closed lips (semi-open compartment condition, SC), with closed compartments after the generation of a negative pressure (CCN) and swallowing (SW). Pressure curve characteristics were compared between the different measurement phases (OC, SC, CCN, SW) as well as between the two compartments (IOS, SPS) using analysis of variance and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests adopting a significance level of α = 0.05. Both null hypotheses were rejected. Average pressures (IOS, SPS) in the experimental phases were 0.0, -0.08 (OC); -0.16, -1.0 (SC); -48.79, -81.86 (CCN); and -29.25, -62.51 (SW) mbar. CCN plateau and peak characteristics significantly differed between the two compartments SPS and IOS. These results indicate the formation of two different intra-oral functional anatomical compartments which provide a deeper understanding of orofacial biofunctions and explain previous observations of negative intra-oral pressures at rest.
口腔姿势被认为对错颌畸形的发展和复发有重大影响。通过生物功能模型进行了测试,零假设为:(1)在不同口腔功能期间的压力之间没有显著差异;(2)在不同口腔隔室中的压力测量之间没有显著差异,以便通过口腔内压力动态来证实各种休息时的姿势条件。同时使用数字压力计在前庭间(IOS)和腭穹窿(SPS)中进行大气压监测。评估了 20 名正常咬合的受试者在张口状态(OC)、轻闭嘴唇(半开隔室条件,SC)、在产生负压后关闭隔室(CCN)和吞咽(SW)时的情况。使用方差分析和 Wilcoxon 匹配对检验比较了不同测量阶段(OC、SC、CCN、SW)以及两个隔室(IOS、SPS)之间的压力曲线特征,采用的显著水平为α=0.05。两个零假设均被拒绝。实验阶段的平均压力(IOS、SPS)为 0.0、-0.08(OC);-0.16、-1.0(SC);-48.79、-81.86(CCN);和-29.25、-62.51(SW)毫巴。SPS 和 IOS 两个隔室之间的 CCN 平台和峰值特征差异显著。这些结果表明形成了两个不同的口腔内功能解剖隔室,这为口面生物功能提供了更深入的了解,并解释了以前观察到的休息时口腔内负压的现象。