Kayamori Fabiane, Rabelo Fabio Augusto Winckler, Nazario Daniella, Thuller Eric Rodrigues, Bianchini Esther Mandelbaum Gonçalves
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP, Programa de Pós Graduação em Fonoaudiologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Hospital Samaritano, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia - São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil.
Sleep Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):95-104. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20220030.
To organize an assessment instrument with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment for OSA patients and correlate it with the upper airway obstructive site detected during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).
29 OSA patients aged 22-65 years with an indication to undergo DISE to evaluate an alternative treatment to PAP and signed the consent form. Patients over 65 years old with maxillofacial deficiency and BMI>30 were excluded. The subjects answered the Pittsburgh, Berlin (snore), and Epworth questionnaires. The myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment comprised soft palate, palatine pillars, and uvula (structure and mobility), tonsils (size), mandible (bony bases), hard palate (depth and width), tongue (posture, volume, width, and height), floor of mouth (mylohyoid), tongue suction and sustaining (mobility), "lowering of the back of the tongue" (stimulus), which were scored by three speech-language pathologists with expertise. DISE was scored according to VOTE classification. The statistical analysis (t-test) compared groups without and with obstruction in VOTE with questionnaires and myofunctional orofacial/oropharyngeal assessment.
The following were significantly different: snoring frequency (p=0.03) with VOTE/velopharynx; intensity (p=0.02) and frequency of snoring (p=0.03) with VOTE/lateral wall of oropharynx; suction the tongue and sustain (p=0.02) with VOTE/velopharynx; hard palate depth (p=0.02) and width (p=0.05) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; tonsils volume (p=0.05) with VOTE/epiglottis; tongue posture (p=0.00) with obstruction VOTE/epiglottis; floor of the mouth (p=0.02) with VOTE/epiglottis.
Higher snoring frequency and intensity was observed in patients with obstruction at the velopharynx and oropharyngeal lateral wall. Obstruction at the velopharynx was associated with poor tongue ability to suck the tongue against the hard palate. Obstruction at the epiglottis had structural and functional associations, including the oropharyngeal lateral wall, affected by the palatine tonsils size, depth and width of the hard palate, tongue position, and flaccidity of the floor of mouth. Considering that this is a preliminary study, the data should be carefully verified and not generalized.
为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者编制一份包含问卷及口面/口咽肌功能评估的评估工具,并将其与药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)期间检测到的上气道阻塞部位相关联。
29例年龄在22 - 65岁之间、有指征接受DISE以评估持续气道正压通气(PAP)替代治疗且签署了知情同意书的OSA患者。排除65岁以上有颌面缺陷且体重指数(BMI)>30的患者。受试者回答匹兹堡问卷、柏林问卷(打鼾情况)和爱泼华嗜睡量表问卷。口面/口咽肌功能评估包括软腭、腭弓和悬雍垂(结构和活动度)、扁桃体(大小)、下颌骨(骨基)、硬腭(深度和宽度)、舌(姿势、体积、宽度和高度)、口底(下颌舌骨肌)、舌的吸附和维持(活动度)、“舌后降”(刺激),由三位有专业知识的言语病理学家进行评分。DISE根据VOTE分类进行评分。统计分析(t检验)比较了VOTE分类中无阻塞和有阻塞的两组在问卷及口面/口咽肌功能评估方面的情况。
以下方面存在显著差异:VOTE/腭咽平面的打鼾频率(p = 0.03);VOTE/口咽侧壁的打鼾强度(p = 参考译文0.02)和频率(p = 0.03);VOTE/腭咽平面的舌吸附和维持能力(p = 0.02);VOTE/会厌平面有阻塞时的硬腭深度(p = 0.02)和宽度(p = 0.05);VOTE/会厌平面的扁桃体体积(p = 0.05);VOTE/会厌平面有阻塞时的舌姿势(p = 0.00);VOTE/会厌平面的口底情况(p = 0.02)。
腭咽平面和口咽侧壁阻塞的患者打鼾频率和强度更高。腭咽平面阻塞与舌对硬腭的吸附能力差有关。会厌平面阻塞存在结构和功能方面的关联,包括口咽侧壁,受腭扁桃体大小、硬腭深度和宽度、舌位置以及口底松弛度的影响。鉴于这是一项初步研究,数据应仔细核实,不可一概而论。