• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经会阴手术与经腹手术治疗全层直肠脱垂的比较。

Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2010 May;34(5):1116-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0429-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-010-0429-0
PMID:20127331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We can divide surgery for rectal prolapse into two broad categories: abdominal and perineal. However, few studies compare the long-term outcomes and quality of life among operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to compare abdominal (AO) versus perineal (PO) procedures for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse regarding recurrence rate, incontinence, constipation, and quality of life.

METHODS

Records of 177 operations from 1995 to 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. A telephone survey was attempted for all. Seventy-five (42%) responded to the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), KESS Constipation Score (KESS-CS), and SF-36 Quality of Life Score. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

For the 122 AO and 55 PO, there were no deaths. Mean follow-up was similar (PO 3.1 vs. AO 3.9 years; P = 0.306). As expected the PO patients were older (mean 69 vs. 55 years) and had higher ASA scores. Those undergoing PO had less procedural blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and dietary restriction. The PO group also scored worse on the physical component of SF-36 (PO 33 vs. AO 39.6; P = 0.034). However, the rate of recurrent prolapse was significantly higher for the PO (PO 26.5% vs. AO 5.2%; P < 0.001). Complications, CCIS, KESS-CS, and SF-36 mental component were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In full-thickness rectal prolapse, elderly, sick patients are selected for a perineal operation. The morbidity, functional outcomes, and quality of life are acceptable. However, the high recurrence rates make the perineal operation a second-best choice for younger, healthy patients.

摘要

背景

我们可以将直肠脱垂手术分为两类:腹部手术和会阴手术。然而,很少有研究比较全层直肠脱垂手术的长期疗效和生活质量。本研究旨在比较全层直肠脱垂的腹部(AO)与会阴(PO)手术,评估复发率、失禁、便秘和生活质量。

方法

回顾性分析 1995 年至 2001 年的 177 例手术记录。对所有患者进行电话调查。共有 75 例(42%)对克利夫兰诊所失禁评分(CCIS)、KESS 便秘评分(KESS-CS)和 SF-36 生活质量评分做出回应。进行了适当的统计分析。

结果

在 122 例 AO 和 55 例 PO 患者中,无死亡病例。平均随访时间相似(PO 3.1 年,AO 3.9 年;P = 0.306)。如预期的那样,PO 患者年龄较大(平均 69 岁,AO 为 55 岁),ASA 评分较高。PO 组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间和饮食限制较少。PO 组 SF-36 的生理成分评分较差(PO 33 分,AO 39.6 分;P = 0.034)。然而,PO 组的复发率显著较高(PO 26.5%,AO 5.2%;P < 0.001)。两组的并发症、CCIS、KESS-CS 和 SF-36 心理成分评分相似。

结论

在全层直肠脱垂中,老年、体弱患者选择会阴手术。发病率、功能结果和生活质量是可以接受的。然而,高复发率使得会阴手术成为年轻、健康患者的次选。

相似文献

1
Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse.经会阴手术与经腹手术治疗全层直肠脱垂的比较。
World J Surg. 2010 May;34(5):1116-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0429-0.
2
Perineal rectosigmoidectomy: quality of life.经会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术:生活质量。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):1000-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12214.
3
Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for primary and recurrent rectal prolapse: are the results comparable the second time?经会阴直肠乙状结肠切除术治疗原发性和复发性直肠脱垂:第二次手术的结果是否可比?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jun;55(6):666-70. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825042c5.
4
Comparing perineal repairs for rectal prolapse: Delorme versus Altemeier.直肠脱垂会阴修补术的比较:德洛姆术式与阿尔特迈尔术式
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Sep;19(9):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1337-y. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
Combined surgery in pelvic organ prolapse is safe and effective.盆腔器官脱垂的联合手术是安全有效的。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Mar;12(3):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01772.x. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
6
Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis.直肠前突的腹部修复术在高危患者中比会阴修复术更安全吗?一项 NSQIP 分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1167-72. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826ab5e6.
7
Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.三种会阴手术治疗直肠脱垂的比较。
South Med J. 1997 Sep;90(9):925-32. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199709000-00013.
8
Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Wells Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Long-Term Results.腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术与腹腔镜韦尔斯直肠固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0012. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
9
Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂经会阴直肠切除术后的复发情况及生活质量
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Aug;12(8):1446-51. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0531-x. Epub 2008 May 31.
10
Perineal stapled prolapse resection for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a multicentre prospective study.会阴吻合器直肠脱垂切除术治疗全层直肠外脱垂:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1094-1100. doi: 10.1111/codi.13328.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of rectal prolapse in octogenarians: lesson learned in 13 years' experience from a high-volume center.老年患者直肠脱垂的管理:来自一家大型中心13年经验的教训
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02313-y.
2
Rectal prolapse in adult patients with anorectal malformations: considerations for adult colorectal surgeons.成年肛门直肠畸形患者的直肠脱垂:成年结直肠外科医生的考量
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 15;41(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06077-9.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Transabdominal and Transperineal Approaches for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse Repair: A Fourteen-Year Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery for total rectal prolapse.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的比较
Surg Today. 2005;35(6):446-52. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2946-7.
2
Treatment of massive rectal prolapse.巨大直肠脱垂的治疗
Am J Surg. 1952 Jan;83(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(52)90161-x.
3
Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria.基于临床标准的直肠脱垂手术类型选择策略。
经腹与经会阴入路全层直肠脱垂修复术的比较结果:一项十四年回顾性研究
Gastroenterology Res. 2025 Apr;18(2):85-92. doi: 10.14740/gr2015. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
Rectal Prolapse Surgery: Balancing Effectiveness and Safety in Abdominal and Perineal Approaches.直肠脱垂手术:腹部和会阴入路中有效性与安全性的平衡
Cureus. 2024 Sep 21;16(9):e69868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69868. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes.经会阴直肠前切除术(Altemeier 手术)后复发直肠脱垂行腹侧网片直肠固定术:可行性和结局。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 2;409(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03227-w.
6
Colonoscopy-assisted percutaneous sigmoidopexy (CAPS) for complete rectal prolapse treatment: Case series.结肠镜辅助经皮乙状结肠固定术(CAPS)治疗完全性直肠脱垂:病例系列
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Oct 9;11(10):E931-E934. doi: 10.1055/a-2131-5037. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Current diagnostic tools and treatment modalities for rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂的当前诊断工具和治疗方式。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jun 6;11(16):3680-3693. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i16.3680.
8
Colonoscopy-assisted percutaneous sigmoidopexy for a complete rectal prolapse: A case report.结肠镜辅助下经皮乙状结肠固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂:1例病例报告
DEN Open. 2022 Oct 17;3(1):e175. doi: 10.1002/deo2.175. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Mesh erosion into the rectum after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A case report.腹腔镜直肠后固定术后补片侵蚀入直肠:一例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jun;95:107136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107136. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
10
Abdominal versus perineal approach for external rectal prolapse: systematic review with meta-analysis.经腹与经会阴入路治疗直肠外脱垂:系统评价与Meta分析
BJS Open. 2022 Mar 8;6(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac018.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0013-x. Epub 2004 Jan 2.
4
Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.直肠脱垂的开放手术与腹腔镜手术:一项评估短期结局的病例对照研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Mar;46(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6555-8.
5
Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy.
Am J Surg. 2001 Aug;182(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00672-9.
6
Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS).慢性便秘患者症状的线性判别分析:一种新评分系统(KESS)的验证
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Oct;43(10):1419-26. doi: 10.1007/BF02236639.
7
Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy.Ripstein直肠固定术后的长期结果和功能结局
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02237241.
8
Evaluation and outcome of the delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction.直肠出口梗阻治疗中Delorme手术的评估与结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Feb;43(2):188-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02236980.
9
Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.评价德洛姆手术作为全层直肠脱垂治疗方法的效果。
Br J Surg. 2000 Feb;87(2):218-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01342.x.
10
Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach.直肠脱垂的直肠切除固定术。腹腔镜手术入路。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Sep;13(9):862-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649901120.