Department of Education Sciences in Sport and Physical Activity, University "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Dec;26(8):752-8. doi: 10.1080/02643290903526289.
Lachmann and Van Leeuwen (2008) proposed two diagnostic subtypes of developmental dyslexia in a language with transparent orthography (German). The classification was based on reading time, rather than reading errors, for lists of words and nonwords. The two subtypes were "frequent-word reading impaired" (FWRI) and "nonword reading impaired" (NWRI). Notably, FWRI were very slow in reading high-frequency words but as fast as controls in reading nonwords; ca. one-third of these children showed this "reversed lexicality effect" in a particularly marked fashion (i.e., read nonwords two to three times faster than high-frequency words). Since Italian is a highly transparent language, we applied this classification to 87 third- and sixth-grade dyslexics from various previously published studies. Some children showed a marked lexicality effect, while others showed small or no difference between word and nonword reading speed. However, regardless of stimulus length, grade and presence/absence of a previous language delay, no child showed a marked reversed lexicality effect; more generally, no child could be classified as FWRI. These findings indicate that the search for subtypes of developmental dyslexia in transparent orthographies still constitutes an open question.
拉赫曼和范·利文(2008 年)在一种拼写透明的语言(德语)中提出了发展性阅读障碍的两种诊断亚型。该分类是基于阅读时间,而不是阅读错误,适用于单词和非单词列表。这两种亚型分别是“高频词阅读障碍”(FWRI)和“非词阅读障碍”(NWRI)。值得注意的是,FWRI 阅读高频词非常缓慢,但阅读非词的速度与对照组一样快;大约三分之一的这些孩子表现出这种“反向词汇效应”,表现得尤为明显(即,阅读非词的速度比高频词快两到三倍)。由于意大利语是一种高度透明的语言,我们将这种分类应用于来自各种先前发表的研究的 87 名三、六年级阅读障碍儿童。一些儿童表现出明显的词汇效应,而另一些儿童在单词和非单词阅读速度之间的差异较小或没有差异。然而,无论刺激长度、年级以及是否存在先前的语言延迟,没有儿童表现出明显的反向词汇效应;更普遍地说,没有儿童可以被归类为 FWRI。这些发现表明,在拼写透明的语言中寻找发展性阅读障碍的亚型仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。