Suppr超能文献

正字法规则下的发展性阅读障碍:阅读特征能否简化为策略控制?

Developmental dyslexia in a regular orthography: can the reading profile be reduced to strategic control?

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Rome "La Sapienza" , Rome , Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(3):147-71. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.814569. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

In languages with regular orthographies, the identification of different forms of reading impairment (such as surface or phonological dyslexia) has proved elusive. Alternatively, it has been proposed that different patterns of errors depend upon strategic choices on the part of the reader. The present study aimed to test this strategic interpretation by evaluating the effectiveness of instructions to read quickly (or accurately) in modifying the reading rate and types of errors of dyslexic children. Further, drawing on an error classification based on the contrast between sounding-out behaviour and word substitution, we examined the types of reading error that best characterize the deficit in a language with regular orthography (Italian). Thirty children with dyslexia and 30 chronologically age-matched controls read aloud passages and word lists with instructions to emphasize either rate or accuracy. When asked to read quickly, children with dyslexia increased their reading rate (although less than skilled children). However, the type of instructions had little influence on reading errors. Therefore, the results did not support the view that strategic control has an important role in modulating the types of reading errors made by children with dyslexia. For word lists, sounding-out behaviour, errors in stress assignment, and form-related nonwords were useful to correctly identifying children with dyslexia. For text passages, sounding-out behaviour and form-related errors were the best predictors of group membership. Thus, specific types of errors are a fundamental component of the reading deficit in children who speak a language with regular orthography over and above their reading slowness.

摘要

在具有规则正字法的语言中,识别不同形式的阅读障碍(如表面或语音阅读障碍)一直难以捉摸。或者,有人提出,不同的错误模式取决于读者的策略选择。本研究旨在通过评估快速阅读(或准确阅读)的指令对改变阅读障碍儿童的阅读速度和错误类型的有效性来检验这一策略解释。此外,我们根据语音行为和单词替换之间的对比对错误进行分类,研究了最能描述具有规则正字法的语言(意大利语)缺陷的阅读错误类型。对 30 名阅读障碍儿童和 30 名按年龄匹配的对照组儿童进行了大声朗读短文和单词列表的测试,测试时给他们的指令是强调速度或准确性。当要求快速阅读时,阅读障碍儿童提高了阅读速度(尽管不如熟练儿童快)。然而,指令的类型对阅读错误的影响很小。因此,结果不支持策略控制在调节阅读障碍儿童阅读错误类型方面具有重要作用的观点。对于单词列表,语音行为、重音分配错误和形式相关的非单词对于正确识别阅读障碍儿童很有用。对于短文,语音行为和形式相关的错误是区分阅读障碍儿童和对照组儿童的最佳预测指标。因此,特定类型的错误是阅读障碍儿童阅读缺陷的一个基本组成部分,这一点超过了他们阅读速度较慢的因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验