Suppr超能文献

三种评估淋巴瘤患者放射性免疫治疗后红骨髓剂量的方法。

Three methods assessing red marrow dosimetry in lymphoma patients treated with radioimmunotherapy.

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, CLCC Gauducheau, St Herblain, France.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4 Suppl):1093-100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24797.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maximum injected activity in radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is limited by bone marrow toxicity. Many dosimetric approaches have been proposed, leading to high variability in the results and elusive absorbed dose-effect relations. This study presents the results of red marrow (RM) absorbed dose estimates performed with 3 methods.

METHODS

Five patients received 2 co-infusions of (90)Y-labeled (370 MBq/m2) and (111)In- labeled (120 MBq) epratuzumab (1.5 mg/kg) 1 week apart. RM-absorbed dose was estimated by 3 methodologies. The first approach (M1) used L(2)-L(4) lumbar vertebrae imaging. M2 and M3 methods used different red marrow to blood ratios (RMBLR) to assess RM-absorbed dose. RMBLR was set to a fixed value of 0.36 in M2 or assessed according to each patient's hematocrit in M3.

RESULTS

Median RM-absorbed doses were 4.1 (2.9-8.4), 2.3 (2.0-2.7), and 2.3 (1.6-2.5) mGy/MBq for M1, M2, and M3, respectively. No trend could be found between total RM-absorbed dose and toxicity for M2 and M3. Conversely, M1 seemed to provide the best absorbed dose-effect relation. The 4 patients with the highest RM-absorbed doses exhibited grade 4 toxicity. The fifth patient, with the lowest RB absorbed dose, exhibited only a mild (grade 2) toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-based methodology (M1) seems to better predict hematological toxicity as compared with blood-based methods. Only this method provides for bone marrow involvement.

摘要

背景

放射性免疫疗法(RIT)的最大注射活度受到骨髓毒性的限制。已经提出了许多剂量学方法,导致结果差异很大,吸收剂量-效应关系难以捉摸。本研究介绍了用 3 种方法进行红骨髓(RM)吸收剂量估计的结果。

方法

5 例患者在一周内接受了两次(90)Y 标记(370 MBq/m2)和(111)In 标记(120 MBq)epratuzumab(1.5 mg/kg)的共输注。通过 3 种方法估计 RM 吸收剂量。第一种方法(M1)使用 L2-L4 腰椎成像。M2 和 M3 方法使用不同的红骨髓与血液比(RMBLR)来评估 RM 吸收剂量。在 M2 中,RMBLR 设定为固定值 0.36,或在 M3 中根据每个患者的血细胞比容进行评估。

结果

中位数 RM 吸收剂量分别为 M1(4.1 [2.9-8.4])、M2(2.3 [2.0-2.7])和 M3(2.3 [1.6-2.5])mGy/MBq。对于 M2 和 M3,总 RM 吸收剂量与毒性之间没有趋势。相反,M1 似乎提供了最佳的吸收剂量-效应关系。4 例 RM 吸收剂量最高的患者出现 4 级毒性。第 5 例 RM 吸收剂量最低的患者仅出现轻度(2 级)毒性。

结论

与基于血液的方法相比,基于图像的方法(M1)似乎能更好地预测血液学毒性。只有这种方法提供骨髓受累情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验