Medical Physics Department, CLCC Gauducheau, St Herblain, France.
Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4 Suppl):1093-100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24797.
Maximum injected activity in radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is limited by bone marrow toxicity. Many dosimetric approaches have been proposed, leading to high variability in the results and elusive absorbed dose-effect relations. This study presents the results of red marrow (RM) absorbed dose estimates performed with 3 methods.
Five patients received 2 co-infusions of (90)Y-labeled (370 MBq/m2) and (111)In- labeled (120 MBq) epratuzumab (1.5 mg/kg) 1 week apart. RM-absorbed dose was estimated by 3 methodologies. The first approach (M1) used L(2)-L(4) lumbar vertebrae imaging. M2 and M3 methods used different red marrow to blood ratios (RMBLR) to assess RM-absorbed dose. RMBLR was set to a fixed value of 0.36 in M2 or assessed according to each patient's hematocrit in M3.
Median RM-absorbed doses were 4.1 (2.9-8.4), 2.3 (2.0-2.7), and 2.3 (1.6-2.5) mGy/MBq for M1, M2, and M3, respectively. No trend could be found between total RM-absorbed dose and toxicity for M2 and M3. Conversely, M1 seemed to provide the best absorbed dose-effect relation. The 4 patients with the highest RM-absorbed doses exhibited grade 4 toxicity. The fifth patient, with the lowest RB absorbed dose, exhibited only a mild (grade 2) toxicity.
Image-based methodology (M1) seems to better predict hematological toxicity as compared with blood-based methods. Only this method provides for bone marrow involvement.
放射性免疫疗法(RIT)的最大注射活度受到骨髓毒性的限制。已经提出了许多剂量学方法,导致结果差异很大,吸收剂量-效应关系难以捉摸。本研究介绍了用 3 种方法进行红骨髓(RM)吸收剂量估计的结果。
5 例患者在一周内接受了两次(90)Y 标记(370 MBq/m2)和(111)In 标记(120 MBq)epratuzumab(1.5 mg/kg)的共输注。通过 3 种方法估计 RM 吸收剂量。第一种方法(M1)使用 L2-L4 腰椎成像。M2 和 M3 方法使用不同的红骨髓与血液比(RMBLR)来评估 RM 吸收剂量。在 M2 中,RMBLR 设定为固定值 0.36,或在 M3 中根据每个患者的血细胞比容进行评估。
中位数 RM 吸收剂量分别为 M1(4.1 [2.9-8.4])、M2(2.3 [2.0-2.7])和 M3(2.3 [1.6-2.5])mGy/MBq。对于 M2 和 M3,总 RM 吸收剂量与毒性之间没有趋势。相反,M1 似乎提供了最佳的吸收剂量-效应关系。4 例 RM 吸收剂量最高的患者出现 4 级毒性。第 5 例 RM 吸收剂量最低的患者仅出现轻度(2 级)毒性。
与基于血液的方法相比,基于图像的方法(M1)似乎能更好地预测血液学毒性。只有这种方法提供骨髓受累情况。