Scott Andrew R, Chong Peter Siao Tick, Hartnick Christopher J, Randolph Gregory W
Department of Otology and Laryngology, Pediatric Division, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Jan;119(1):54-63. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900111.
We sought to determine the feasibility of performing spontaneous and evoked intraoperative laryngeal electromyography (L-EMG) using nerve monitoring equipment and to compare recording electrode configurations and methods of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) stimulation in dogs.
Four beagles underwent crush injury of the left RLN, and 2 beagles underwent left RLN transection. Serial spontaneous and evoked L-EMG was recorded with the NIM-Response nerve monitoring system under sedation. Transesophageal, percutaneous, and direct open RLN stimulation was performed. Recordings of spontaneous and evoked responses were made with endotracheal tube surface electrodes and bipolar vocal fold needle electrodes. The L-EMG procedures were repeated every 1 to 2 weeks after injury, and intersubject and intertrial differences were evaluated.
Low-amplitude motor unit action potentials, polyphasic potentials, fasciculations, and fibrillations were detected in injured animals with bipolar needle recording electrodes with this system of spontaneous L-EMG. The surface recording electrodes did not detect pathologic waveforms. Percutaneous needle stimulation of the RLN is possible at currents slightly higher than those used for direct stimulation. Consistent, discrete, transesophageal stimulation of the RLN could not be reliably performed. Recording evoked responses with needle electrodes generated sharper waveforms, facilitating calculation of latency and wave duration. Evoked L-EMG utilizing surface recording electrodes limited the intertrial and intersubject variability of evoked amplitude.
Typical patterns of nerve injury can be detected with this system of intraoperative L-EMG in a canine model. Quantitative measures of amplitude, latency, and wave duration in healthy and injured canine RLNs may be determined with this system.
我们试图确定使用神经监测设备进行自发性和诱发性术中喉肌电图(L-EMG)的可行性,并比较犬类喉返神经(RLN)刺激的记录电极配置和方法。
4只比格犬接受左侧RLN挤压伤,2只比格犬接受左侧RLN横断术。在镇静状态下,使用NIM-Response神经监测系统记录系列自发性和诱发性L-EMG。进行经食管、经皮和直接开放RLN刺激。使用气管导管表面电极和双极声带针电极记录自发性和诱发性反应。损伤后每1至2周重复L-EMG程序,并评估个体间和试验间差异。
使用该自发性L-EMG系统的双极针记录电极,在受伤动物中检测到低振幅运动单位动作电位、多相电位、肌束震颤和纤颤。表面记录电极未检测到病理波形。在略高于直接刺激所用电流的情况下,可以对RLN进行经皮针刺激。无法可靠地进行一致、离散的经食管RLN刺激。使用针电极记录诱发性反应产生的波形更清晰,便于计算潜伏期和波持续时间。利用表面记录电极的诱发性L-EMG限制了诱发性振幅的试验间和个体间变异性。
在犬模型中,使用该术中L-EMG系统可检测到典型的神经损伤模式。使用该系统可确定健康和受伤犬类RLN的振幅、潜伏期和波持续时间的定量指标。