Scott Andrew R, Chong Peter Siao Tick, Brigger Matthew T, Randolph Gregory W, Hartnick Christopher J
Dept of Otology and Laryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Jan;118(1):56-66. doi: 10.1177/000348940911800110.
We sought to determine whether serial intraoperative laryngeal electromyography (L-EMG) or evoked L-EMG predicts vocal fold (VF) recovery following iatrogenic injury.
Six beagles were sedated, and bipolar needle electrodes were inserted into each thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle. Endotracheal tube surface electrodes were also placed. As the sedation lightened, L-EMG activity was recorded from all electrodes with an intraoperative nerve monitoring system. The neck was opened, and direct recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) stimulation was performed. Subsequently, 4 animals underwent crush injury of the left RLN,and 2 animals underwent nerve transection. The L-EMG procedures were repeated every 1 to 2 weeks until left VF motion was observed in the dogs that suffered RLN crush injury. At each time point, the neck was opened and both RLNs were stimulated.
Fibrillation potentials were detected in all animals after RLN injury. A change to electrical silence was seen in the animals in the crush injury group that were evaluated during the week preceding VF recovery. Fibrillation potentials and VF immobility persisted in the transection group throughout the complete time course of these experiments. The first appearance of an evoked response coincided with or occurred after the return of left VF motion in the crush injury group. The threshold, latency, and amplitude differed from those of the controls and approached normal values over time. No response was detected in the transected nerves.
The disappearance of fibrillations on intraoperative L-EMG was noted in the animals tested the week before the return of VF motion, and the return of motor unit action potentials was seen along with return of VF function. Evoked L-EMG was not helpful in predicting the return of VF mobility, but it may help quantify degrees of RLN injury and predict the speed of recovery.
我们试图确定术中连续喉肌电图(L-EMG)或诱发肌电图是否能预测医源性损伤后声带(VF)的恢复情况。
对6只比格犬进行镇静,将双极针电极插入每侧甲杓肌(TA)。同时放置气管导管表面电极。随着镇静程度减轻,用术中神经监测系统记录所有电极的L-EMG活动。切开颈部,进行喉返神经(RLN)直接刺激。随后,4只动物接受左侧RLN挤压伤,2只动物接受神经横断伤。每1至2周重复进行L-EMG检查,直到遭受RLN挤压伤的犬出现左侧VF运动。在每个时间点,切开颈部并刺激双侧RLN。
RLN损伤后所有动物均检测到纤颤电位。在VF恢复前一周接受评估的挤压伤组动物中,出现了电静息变化。在整个实验过程中,横断伤组的纤颤电位和VF固定持续存在。挤压伤组诱发反应的首次出现与左侧VF运动恢复同时或之后发生。其阈值、潜伏期和波幅与对照组不同,且随时间接近正常值。横断神经未检测到反应。
在VF运动恢复前一周进行检测的动物中,术中L-EMG上的纤颤消失,并且随着VF功能恢复,可见运动单位动作电位的恢复。诱发L-EMG对预测VF活动恢复没有帮助,但可能有助于量化RLN损伤程度并预测恢复速度。