What's the rush? Internal validity is not a trivial pursuit.
作者信息
Kovach Christine R
出版信息
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010 Jan;3(1):2-4. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20091214-01.
PMID:20128537
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What's the rush? Internal validity is not a trivial pursuit.急什么？内部效度并非微不足道的追求。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010 Jan;3(1):2-4. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20091214-01.
2
Moving forward with randomized controlled trials.
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jan;2(1):3. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090101-05.
3
Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers.理解与评判定量研究论文。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(28):28-30.
4
A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials.对通过临床试验提供的证据的批判性方法。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(36):36-8.
5
Validity and reliability--What's it all about? Part 1. Validity in quantitative studies.效度与信度——这一切究竟是怎么回事？第1部分. 定量研究中的效度
Paediatr Nurs. 2004 Nov;16(9):28. doi: 10.7748/paed2004.11.16.9.28.c954.
6
An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.一项多中心临床试验中评估失明的指标：用于戒酒的双硫仑——一项退伍军人事务部合作研究
Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1421-34. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::AID-SIM266>3.0.CO;2-H.
7
Randomised controlled trials for chronic illness management research - where's the tipping point?慢性病管理研究的随机对照试验——临界点在哪里？
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(7B):147-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02475.x.
8
Two-group experimental designs.
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):619-22. doi: 10.1177/0193945903255662.
9
Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.评估护理期刊中随机临床试验报告的质量。
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;19(2):25-39.
10
Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.严格评价。5. 随机对照试验：获取有效证据的问题。
NT Learn Curve. 1999 Jul 7;3(5):6-8.
Zotero 插件