Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Aug;85(3):643-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00121.x. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
Despite increasing interest in urban ecology the factors limiting the colonisation of towns and cities by species from rural areas are poorly understood. This is largely due to the lack of a detailed conceptual framework for this urbanisation process, and of sufficient case studies. Here, we develop such a framework. This draws upon a wide range of ecological and evolutionary theory and the increasing number of studies of how the markedly divergent conditions in urban and rural areas influence the traits of urban populations and the structure of urban assemblages. We illustrate the importance of this framework by compiling a detailed case study of spatial and temporal variation in the urbanisation of the blackbird Turdus merula. Our framework identifies three separate stages in the urbanisation process: (i) arrival, (ii) adjustment, and (iii) spread. The rate of progress through each stage is influenced by environmental factors, especially human attitudes and socio-economic factors that determine the history of urban development and the quality of urban habitats, and by species' ecological and life-history traits. Some traits can positively influence progression through one stage, but delay progression through another. Rigorous assessment of the factors influencing urbanisation should thus ideally pay attention to the different stages. Urbanisation has some similarities to invasion of exotic species, but the two clearly differ. Invasion concerns geographic range expansion that is external to the species' original geographic range, whilst urbanisation typically relates to filling gaps within a species' original range. This process is exemplified by the blackbird which is now one of the commonest urban bird species throughout its Western Palearctic range. This is in stark contrast to the situation 150 years ago when the species was principally confined to forest. Blackbird urbanisation was first recorded in Germany in 1820, yet some European cities still lack urban blackbirds. This is especially so in the east, where urbanisation has spread more slowly than in the west. The timing of blackbird urbanisation exhibits a marked spatial pattern, with latitude and longitude explaining 76% of the variation. This strong spatial pattern contrasts with the weaker spatial pattern in timing of urbanisation exhibited by the woodpigeon Columba palumbus (with location explaining 39% of the variation), and with the very weak spatial pattern in timing of black-billed magpie Pica pica urbanisation (in which location explains 12% of the variation). Strong spatial patterns in timing of urbanisation are more compatible with the leap-frog urbanisation model, in which urban adapted or imprinted birds colonise other towns and cities, than with the independent urbanisation model, in which urban colonisation events occur independently of each other. Spatial patterns in isolation do not, however, confirm one particular model. Factors relating to the arrival and adjustment stages appear particularly likely to have influenced the timing of blackbird urbanisation. Spatial variation in the occurrence of urban populations and the timing of their establishment creates opportunities to assess the factors regulating urbanisation rates, and how the composition of urban assemblages develops as a result. These are major issues for urban ecology.
尽管人们对城市生态学越来越感兴趣,但物种从农村地区向城市殖民的限制因素仍了解甚少。这主要是由于缺乏一个详细的城市发展过程概念框架,以及足够的案例研究。在这里,我们提出了这样一个框架。这借鉴了广泛的生态和进化理论,以及越来越多的关于城市和农村地区明显不同的条件如何影响城市种群的特征和城市组合的结构的研究。我们通过编译关于黑鸟 Turdus merula 城市化的时空变化的详细案例研究来说明该框架的重要性。我们的框架确定了城市化过程中的三个独立阶段:(i)到达,(ii)调整,和 (iii)传播。每个阶段的进展速度受环境因素的影响,特别是决定城市发展历史和城市栖息地质量的人类态度和社会经济因素,以及物种的生态和生活史特征。一些特征可以积极地影响一个阶段的进展,但会延迟另一个阶段的进展。因此,对影响城市化的因素进行严格评估,理想情况下应注意不同的阶段。城市化与入侵外来物种有些相似,但两者显然不同。入侵涉及物种原始地理范围以外的地理范围扩张,而城市化通常与物种原始范围的填补空白有关。黑鸟就是一个很好的例子,它现在是整个西古北区最常见的城市鸟类之一。这与 150 年前的情况形成鲜明对比,当时该物种主要局限于森林。黑鸟的城市化最早于 1820 年在德国被记录下来,但一些欧洲城市仍然没有城市黑鸟。在东部尤其如此,那里的城市化进程比西部慢。黑鸟城市化的时间表现出明显的空间模式,纬度和经度解释了 76%的变化。这种强烈的空间模式与木鸽 Columba palumbus 城市化时间的较弱空间模式形成对比(位置解释了 39%的变化),并且与黑嘴喜鹊 Pica pica 城市化时间的非常弱的空间模式形成对比(位置解释了 12%的变化)。城市化时间的强烈空间模式更符合跳跃式城市化模型,在该模型中,适应或烙印的城市鸟类会殖民其他城镇和城市,而不是独立的城市化模型,在该模型中,城市殖民事件彼此独立发生。孤立的空间模式并不能证实一个特定的模型。与到达和调整阶段有关的因素似乎特别有可能影响黑鸟城市化的时间。城市种群的出现和建立的时间的空间变化为评估调节城市化速度的因素以及城市组合的组成如何因此而发展创造了机会。这些都是城市生态学的主要问题。