Suppr超能文献

偏好与实践:长期护理中生命末期的维持生命治疗。

Preferences versus practice: life-sustaining treatments in last months of life in long-term care.

机构信息

Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jan;11(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.07.005.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine prevalence and correlates of decisions made about specific life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) among residents in long-term care (LTC) settings, including characteristics associated with having an LST performed when the resident reportedly did not desire the LST.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

After-death interviews with 1 family caregiver and 1 staff caregiver for each of 327 LTC residents who died in the facility.

SETTING

The setting included 27 nursing homes (NHs) and 85 residential care/assisted living (RC/AL) settings in 4 states.

MEASUREMENTS

Decedent demographics, facility characteristics, prevalence of decisions made about specific LSTs, percentage of time LSTs were performed when reportedly not desired, and characteristics associated with that.

RESULTS

Most family caregivers reported making a decision with a physician about resuscitation (89.1%), inserting a feeding tube (82.1%), administering antibiotics (64.3%), and hospital transfer (83.7%). Reported care was inconsistent with decisions made in 5 of 7 (71.4%) resuscitations, 1 of 7 feeding tube insertions (14.3%), 15 of 78 antibiotics courses (19.2%), and 26 of 87 hospital transfers (29.9%). Decedents who received antibiotics contrary to their wishes were older (mean age 92 versus 85, P=.014). More than half (53.8%) of decedents who had care discordant with their wishes about hospitalization lived in a NH compared with 32.8% of those whose decisions were concordant (P=.034).

CONCLUSION

Most respondents reported decision making with a doctor about life-sustaining treatments, but those decisions were not consistently heeded. Being older and living in a NH were risk factors for decisions not being heeded.

摘要

目的

确定长期护理(LTC)环境中居民做出特定生命维持治疗(LST)决定的流行率和相关因素,包括与报告称居民不希望进行 LST 但实际上进行了 LST 相关的特征。

设计和参与者

对在该设施中死亡的 327 名 LTC 居民的每位居民的 1 名家庭护理员和 1 名工作人员护理员进行死后访谈。

设置

该设置包括 4 个州的 27 家养老院(NH)和 85 家住宅护理/辅助生活(RC/AL)机构。

测量

死者人口统计学特征、设施特征、关于特定 LST 做出决定的流行率、据报道未期望进行 LST 的时间百分比,以及与该百分比相关的特征。

结果

大多数家庭护理员报告与医生一起就复苏(89.1%)、插入饲管(82.1%)、使用抗生素(64.3%)和医院转移(83.7%)做出了决定。在 7 次复苏中有 5 次(71.4%)、7 次饲管插入中有 1 次(14.3%)、78 次抗生素疗程中有 15 次(19.2%)和 87 次医院转移中有 26 次(29.9%)的报告护理与所做决定不一致。与他们的意愿相反接受抗生素治疗的死者年龄更大(平均年龄 92 岁与 85 岁,P=.014)。超过一半(53.8%)的那些其关于住院治疗的意愿与实际护理不一致的死者居住在 NH 中,而那些决定一致的死者的比例为 32.8%(P=.034)。

结论

大多数受访者报告与医生就生命维持治疗做出决定,但这些决定并未得到一致遵守。年龄较大和居住在 NH 是未遵守决定的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Preferences versus practice: life-sustaining treatments in last months of life in long-term care.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jan;11(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.07.005.
2
Advance care planning in nursing homes and assisted living communities.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 May;10(4):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.10.015. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
4
End-of-life care in assisted living and related residential care settings: comparison with nursing homes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1587-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51511.x.
5
Reasons for Discordance Between Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences and Medical Orders in Nursing Facilities Without POLST.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):837-843. doi: 10.1177/10499091221127996. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06647.x.
9
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):82-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01905.x.
10
Physician communication with family caregivers of long-term care residents at the end of life.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):846-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01179.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Centered Measures of Goal Concordance in Geriatrics and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30370.
2
Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions.
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 12;6(8):e1131. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001131. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
5
Advance Directives in Oncology and Haematology: A Long Way to Go-A Narrative Review.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 23;11(5):1195. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051195.
7
Barriers to the composition and implementation of advance directives in oncology: a literature review.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Nov 12;13:974. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.974. eCollection 2019.
8
Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Apr;59(4):894-915.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
9
Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S17-S27. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0459. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Goals of Care or Goals of Trust? How Family Members Perceive Goals for Dying Nursing Home Residents.
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):360-365. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0271. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Dying with dementia in long-term care.
Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):741-51. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.6.741.
2
Advance directives in nursing home residents aged > or =65 years: United States 2004.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25(6):476-82. doi: 10.1177/1049909108322295. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
4
Advance directives at end-of-life: nursing home resident preferences for artificial nutrition.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 May;8(4):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
5
Family response to end-of-life education: differences by ethnicity and stage of caregiving.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):269-76. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290243.
6
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
9
Advance care planning documents in nursing facilities: results from a nationally representative survey.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Sep-Oct;43(2):193-212. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.10.007. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
10
Decisions to hospitalize nursing home residents dying with advanced dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1396-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53426.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验