• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.鸟类学会将难吃作为毒性的信号。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 7;277(1688):1729-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2092. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
2
Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.捕食者的毒素负荷会影响它们捕食有毒猎物的战略决策。
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.064. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
3
Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.宁要熟悉的魔鬼:鸟类捕食者发现猎物毒性的变化令人厌恶。
Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140533. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0533.
4
Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.在捕食者厌恶学习过程中,警戒色猎物的体型很重要。
Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt B:173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
5
Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey.营养丰富的警戒性猎物被捕食率增加。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 5;281(1781):20133255. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3255. Print 2014 Apr 22.
6
Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.化险为夷:拟态猎物的味觉与毒性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 19;280(1753):20122588. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2588. Print 2013 Feb 22.
7
The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.对捕食者有毒以进行威慑的益处取决于猎物的体型大小。
Behav Ecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;27(6):1650-1655. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw086. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.解毒成本和被捕食风险对觅食的影响:对拟态动态的启示
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169043. eCollection 2017.
9
Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.捕食者决定食用有防御能力的猎物取决于无防御能力猎物的大小。
Anim Behav. 2013 Jun;85(6):1315-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.021.
10
Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.猛禽会根据化学防御机制对具有警戒色的猎物产生味觉排斥。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):348-50. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0483.

引用本文的文献

1
An Interactive Feeder to Induce and Assess Emotions from Vocalisations of Chickens.一种用于诱导和评估鸡叫声所表达情绪的交互式喂食器。
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 6;14(9):1386. doi: 10.3390/ani14091386.
2
The avian taste system.鸟类味觉系统。
Front Physiol. 2023 Sep 8;14:1235377. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1235377. eCollection 2023.
3
Model aversiveness and the evolution of imperfect Batesian mimics.模型厌恶与不完全贝氏拟态的进化
Behav Ecol. 2023 Jul 31;34(5):907-912. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad063. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
4
Clever pest control? The role of cognition in biological pest regulation.聪明的害虫防治?认知在生物害虫防治中的作用。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01731-4. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
5
Meta-analytic evidence for quantitative honesty in aposematic signals.警戒信号中定量诚实性的元分析证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 28;288(1949):20210679. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0679.
6
The Validity of Brine Shrimp (Artemia Sp.) Toxicity Assays to Assess the Ecological Function of Marine Natural Products.卤虫(Artemia sp.)毒性试验评估海洋天然产物生态功能的有效性。
J Chem Ecol. 2021 Nov;47(10-11):834-846. doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01264-z. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Defense against predators incurs high reproductive costs for the aposematic moth .对警戒色蛾来说,抵御捕食者会带来高昂的繁殖成本。
Behav Ecol. 2020 May-Jun;31(3):844-850. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa033. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Methods for independently manipulating palatability and color in small insect prey.独立操控小型昆虫猎物的适口性和颜色的方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0231205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231205. eCollection 2020.
9
The protective value of a defensive display varies with the experience of wild predators.防御展示的保护价值因野生捕食者的经验而异。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36995-9.
10
No evidence of quantitative signal honesty across species of aposematic burnet moths (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae).没有证据表明警戒烧蛾(鳞翅目:眼蝶科)在不同物种间存在信号定量诚实。
J Evol Biol. 2019 Jan;32(1):31-48. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13389. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTION.被未接触过的鸟类攻击后难吃昆虫的存活:对通过个体选择进化的警戒色理论的重新评估
Evolution. 1982 Sep;36(5):998-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05468.x.
2
FORAGING DYNAMICS OF BIRD PREDATORS ON OVERWINTERING MONARCH BUTTERFLIES IN MEXICO.墨西哥越冬黑脉金斑蝶上鸟类捕食者的觅食动态
Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):852-868. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00427.x.
3
Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.具有警戒色的难吃虫子比具有保护色的虫子有更高的存活率。
Oecologia. 1985 Oct;67(3):411-415. doi: 10.1007/BF00384948.
4
Dynamic evolution of bitter taste receptor genes in vertebrates.脊椎动物中苦味受体基因的动态进化
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jan 15;9:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-12.
5
How do predators cope with chemically defended foods?捕食者如何应对具有化学防御的食物?
Biol Bull. 2007 Dec;213(3):252-66. doi: 10.2307/25066643.
6
Defensive secretions of arthropods.节肢动物的防御性分泌物。
Science. 1966 Sep 16;153(3742):1341-50. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3742.1341.
7
Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.捕食者的毒素负荷会影响它们捕食有毒猎物的战略决策。
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.064. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
8
Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.尽管防御能力不均衡,但共拟态生物之间存在互利共生关系。
Nature. 2007 Jul 5;448(7149):64-7. doi: 10.1038/nature05899.
9
Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.猛禽会根据化学防御机制对具有警戒色的猎物产生味觉排斥。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):348-50. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0483.
10
The complex business of survival by aposematism.通过警戒色实现生存的复杂机制。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Nov;20(11):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.011. Epub 2005 Aug 8.

鸟类学会将难吃作为毒性的信号。

Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4HH, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 7;277(1688):1729-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2092. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2009.2092
PMID:20129989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2871851/
Abstract

Aposematic prey advertise their toxicity using conspicuous visual signals that predators quickly learn to avoid. However, it is advantageous for predators not to simply avoid toxic prey, but to learn about the amount of toxin that prey contain, and include them in their diets when the nutritional gains are high relative to the costs of ingesting the toxin. Therefore, when foraging on a defended prey population where individuals vary in their toxin concentration, predators should learn to use cues which distinguish prey with different levels of toxicity in order to include less defended individuals in their diets. In this experiment, we found that European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) could learn to use a bitter taste to predict the amount of toxin that individual prey contained, and use that information to preferentially ingest less toxic prey to maximize their nutrient intake relative to the amount of toxin ingested. Our results suggest that bitter tastes could evolve as reliable signals of toxicity, and can help to explain why many toxins taste bitter. They also highlight the need to develop new mathematical simulations of the evolution of prey defences which incorporate the adaptive decision-making processes underlying nutrient and toxin management.

摘要

警戒性猎物会利用明显的视觉信号来警告捕食者其自身的毒性,而捕食者则会迅速学会避开这些信号。然而,对捕食者来说,仅仅避免食用有毒的猎物是没有好处的,相反,捕食者应该了解猎物中所含毒素的数量,并在摄入毒素的成本相对较高,而营养收益相对较高的情况下,将其纳入自己的食谱中。因此,当捕食者在一个有防御能力的猎物群体中觅食时,猎物个体的毒素浓度存在差异,捕食者应该学会使用能够区分不同毒性水平的线索,以便在其食谱中纳入防御能力较低的个体。在这项实验中,我们发现欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)可以学会利用苦味来预测个体猎物所含的毒素量,并利用这些信息优先摄入毒性较低的猎物,从而在摄入毒素的情况下最大程度地增加其营养摄入。我们的研究结果表明,苦味可能是作为一种可靠的毒性信号而进化出来的,这也可以帮助解释为什么许多毒素都有苦味。这些结果还强调了需要开发新的数学模拟来研究猎物防御的进化,这些模拟应该包含营养和毒素管理的适应性决策过程。