Halpin Christina G, Skelhorn John, Rowe Candy, Ruxton Graeme D, Higginson Andrew D
Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169043. eCollection 2017.
Prey often evolve defences to deter predators, such as noxious chemicals including toxins. Toxic species often advertise their defence to potential predators by distinctive sensory signals. Predators learn to associate toxicity with the signals of these so-called aposematic prey, and may avoid them in future. In turn, this selects for mildly toxic prey to mimic the appearance of more toxic prey. Empirical evidence shows that mimicry could be either beneficial ('Mullerian') or detrimental ('quasi-Batesian') to the highly toxic prey, but the factors determining which are unknown. Here, we use state-dependent models to explore how tri-trophic interactions could influence the evolution of prey defences. We consider how predation risk affects predators' optimal foraging strategies on aposematic prey, and explore the resultant impact this has on mimicry dynamics between unequally defended species. In addition, we also investigate how the potential energetic cost of metabolising a toxin can alter the benefits to eating toxic prey and thus impact on predators' foraging decisions. Our model predicts that both how predators perceive their own predation risk, and the cost of detoxification, can have significant, sometimes counterintuitive, effects on the foraging decisions of predators. For example, in some conditions predators should: (i) avoid prey they know to be undefended, (ii) eat more mildly toxic prey as detoxification costs increase, (iii) increase their intake of highly toxic prey as the abundance of undefended prey increases. These effects mean that the relationship between a mimic and its model can qualitatively depend on the density of alternative prey and the cost of metabolising toxins. In addition, these effects are mediated by the predators' own predation risk, which demonstrates that, higher trophic levels than previously considered can have fundamental impacts on interactions among aposematic prey species.
猎物常常进化出防御机制来威慑捕食者,比如含有毒素等有害化学物质。有毒物种通常会通过独特的感官信号向潜在捕食者宣传它们的防御能力。捕食者学会将毒性与这些所谓的警戒色猎物的信号联系起来,并可能在未来避开它们。相应地,这促使轻度有毒的猎物模仿毒性更强的猎物的外观。实证证据表明,拟态对高毒性猎物可能是有益的(“缪勒拟态”),也可能是有害的(“准贝氏拟态”),但决定其性质的因素尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用状态依赖模型来探究三级营养相互作用如何影响猎物防御机制的进化。我们考虑捕食风险如何影响捕食者对警戒色猎物的最优觅食策略,并探讨这对防御能力不同的物种之间拟态动态的影响。此外,我们还研究了代谢毒素的潜在能量成本如何改变食用有毒猎物的益处,从而影响捕食者的觅食决策。我们的模型预测,捕食者如何感知自身的捕食风险以及解毒成本,都会对捕食者的觅食决策产生重大影响,有时甚至是违反直觉的影响。例如,在某些情况下,捕食者应该:(i)避开它们知道没有防御能力的猎物;(ii)随着解毒成本的增加,食用更多轻度有毒的猎物;(iii)随着无防御能力猎物数量的增加,增加对高毒性猎物的摄入量。这些影响意味着拟态者与其模型之间的关系在性质上可能取决于替代猎物的密度和代谢毒素的成本。此外,这些影响是由捕食者自身的捕食风险介导的,这表明,比之前认为的更高营养级会对警戒色猎物物种之间的相互作用产生根本性影响。