• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代人体实验中的伦理考量。

Ethical considerations in modern human experimentation.

作者信息

Steinberg A

机构信息

Program of Medical Ethics, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Cancer Invest. 1991;9(1):99-105. doi: 10.3109/07357909109032805.

DOI:10.3109/07357909109032805
PMID:2013002
Abstract

The use of properly controlled clinical trials in medical experimentation has been of vital importance to the progress of medical science. At the same time, the new form of experimentation has also generated some of our most difficult and perplexing moral dilemmas. The solutions to the many complicated ethical problems involved in human experimentation are not straightforward, and despite numerous books, articles, codes, guidelines, and declarations, many specific issues of right and wrong in human experimentation have not yet been definitively resolved. Society today has an obligation greater than ever to control, regulate, and enforce properly balanced codes of human experimentation in order to minimize the unacceptable ethical problems and maximize the desired results of modern human experimentation. These, however, are not sufficient. The patient's greatest safeguard in experimentation is a skillful, intelligent, and conscientious physician and investigator. Thus, the investigator bears great responsibility in balancing between the common good and the individual's rights. In this article the relevant secular and Jewish ethical principles and rules concerning human experimentation are specified and methodologically organized. Particular emphasis is placed on the elucidation and evaluation of the ethical controversies surrounding randomized clinical trials.

摘要

在医学实验中使用恰当控制的临床试验对医学科学的进步至关重要。与此同时,这种新的实验形式也引发了一些我们最棘手和令人困惑的道德困境。解决人体实验中涉及的许多复杂伦理问题并非易事,尽管有众多书籍、文章、规范、指南和声明,但人体实验中许多具体的是非问题尚未得到最终解决。当今社会有比以往更大的义务来控制、规范和执行适当平衡的人体实验规范,以尽量减少不可接受的伦理问题,并使现代人体实验的预期结果最大化。然而,这些还不够。患者在实验中的最大保障是一位技术娴熟、明智且尽责的医生和研究者。因此,研究者在平衡公共利益和个人权利方面肩负着重大责任。本文明确阐述并从方法上组织了有关人体实验的相关世俗和犹太伦理原则及规则。特别强调对围绕随机临床试验的伦理争议进行阐释和评估。

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations in modern human experimentation.现代人体实验中的伦理考量。
Cancer Invest. 1991;9(1):99-105. doi: 10.3109/07357909109032805.
2
Biomedical experimentation on the mentally handicapped: ethical and legal dilemmas.针对智障人士的生物医学实验:伦理与法律困境
Med Law. 1990;9(4):1052-61.
3
Controlled clinical trials: some ethical issues.对照临床试验:一些伦理问题。
Control Clin Trials. 1980 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(80)80005-5.
4
Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.在联邦人类研究法规中平衡道德原则。
IRB. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-6.
5
Ethical issues in clinical research: the role of the research ethics committee.临床研究中的伦理问题:研究伦理委员会的作用
Br J Urol. 1995 Nov;76 Suppl 2:23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07867.x.
6
Research ethics.研究伦理。
West Indian Med J. 1995 Dec;44(4):115-8.
7
Beneficence, scientific autonomy, and self-interest: ethical dilemmas in clinical research.善行、科学自主性与自身利益:临床研究中的伦理困境
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Fall;1(4):361-9. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100006551.
8
Advance directives for research: ethical problems and responses.研究中的预先指令:伦理问题与应对措施。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1996 Spring;19(2):107-41. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(96)00001-5.
9
Pediatric Phase I clinical trials: ethical issues and nursing considerations.儿科一期临床试验:伦理问题与护理考量
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1986 Mar-Apr;13(2):29-32.
10
Medical experimentation: international rules and practice.医学实验:国际规则与实践。
Law Rev. 1989 Feb;19(1):1-10.