Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Epilepsia. 2010 Jun;51(6):958-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02496.x. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, lacosamide 400 mg, or lacosamide 600 mg/day. After an 8-week baseline period, patients began treatment with placebo or lacosamide 100 mg/day, were force-titrated weekly (100 mg/day increments) to the target dose, and entered a 12-week maintenance period.
A total of 405 patients were randomized and received trial medication. Most (82.1%) were taking two to three concomitant AEDs. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance (intention-to-treat, ITT) were 37.3% for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p = 0.008) and 37.8% for lacosamide 600 mg/day (p = 0.006) compared to 20.8% for placebo, with responder rates of 38.3% and 41.2%, respectively, compared to placebo (18.3%, p < 0.001; ITT). Patients randomized to lacosamide showed large reductions in secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures, with median percent reductions in seizure frequency of 59.4% for lacosamide 400 mg/day and 93.0% for lacosamide 600 mg/day compared to 14.3% for placebo, and responder rates of 56.0% and 70.2% compared to placebo (33.3%). Dose-related adverse events included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting.
Adjunctive treatment with lacosamide 400 and 600 mg/day reduced seizure frequency for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Lacosamide 400 mg/day provided a good balance of efficacy and tolerability; lacosamide 600 mg/day may provide additional benefit for some patients as suggested by secondary efficacy analyses, including response in patients with secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.
评估拉科酰胺(400 和 600 mg/天)作为辅助治疗在服用一种至三种抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的未控制部分发作性癫痫患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,将患者以 1:2:1 的比例随机分为安慰剂组、拉科酰胺 400 mg 组和拉科酰胺 600 mg/天组。在 8 周的基线期后,患者开始接受安慰剂或拉科酰胺 100 mg/天治疗,每周递增 100 mg/天(递增 100 mg/天)至目标剂量,并进入 12 周的维持期。
共有 405 名患者被随机分配并接受试验药物治疗。大多数(82.1%)患者服用两种至三种 AEDs。从基线到维持期(意向治疗,ITT),拉科酰胺 400 mg/天组的癫痫发作频率中位数降低了 37.3%(p = 0.008),拉科酰胺 600 mg/天组降低了 37.8%(p = 0.006),而安慰剂组降低了 20.8%,分别有 38.3%和 41.2%的应答率,与安慰剂相比(18.3%,p < 0.001;ITT)。随机接受拉科酰胺治疗的患者出现继发性全面强直阵挛性发作的频率显著降低,拉科酰胺 400 mg/天组的癫痫发作频率中位数降低了 59.4%,拉科酰胺 600 mg/天组降低了 93.0%,而安慰剂组降低了 14.3%,应答率分别为 56.0%和 70.2%,与安慰剂组(33.3%)相比。与剂量相关的不良反应包括头晕、恶心和呕吐。
拉科酰胺 400 和 600 mg/天的辅助治疗可降低未控制部分发作性癫痫患者的癫痫发作频率。拉科酰胺 400 mg/天在疗效和耐受性方面提供了良好的平衡;拉科酰胺 600 mg/天可能为某些患者提供额外的益处,这一点从包括继发性全面强直阵挛性癫痫患者在内的次要疗效分析中可以看出。