Suppr超能文献

拉科酰胺辅助治疗未控制部分发作性癫痫患者的长期安全性和疗效:III 期开放标签扩展试验结果。

Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term (up to 5 years exposure) safety and efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in open-label extension trial SP756 (NCT00522275).

METHODS

Patients who completed the double-blind trial SP754 (NCT00136019) were eligible to participate in this open-label extension trial (SP756). At the conclusion of trial SP754, patients had transitioned to lacosamide 200 mg/day. Subsequent dosage adjustments of lacosamide (100-800 mg/day) and/or concomitant AEDs were allowed to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, body weight, clinical laboratory data, electrocardiography studies, and seizure frequency were evaluated.

KEY FINDINGS

A total of 308 patients received open-label lacosamide and 138 patients (44.8%) completed the long-term trial. The median modal dose (defined as the daily lacosamide dose a patient received for the longest duration during the treatment period) was 500 mg/day. The percentages of patients with lacosamide exposure >1, >2, >3, or >4 years were 75%, 63%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. Primary reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (26%) and adverse events (11%). Common TEAEs (≥15%) were dizziness, headache, contusion, nausea, convulsion, nasopharyngitis, fall, vomiting, and diplopia. TEAEs that led to discontinuation in ≥1.0% of patients were dizziness (1.6%) and convulsion (1.0%). The median percent reductions from baseline of trial SP754 in 28-day seizure frequency were 53.4%, 55.2%, 58.1%, and 62.5%, respectively, for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers. The ≥50% responder rates were 52.8%, 56.5%, 58.7%, and 62.5% for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers, respectively. Seven of eight patients on lacosamide monotherapy for ≥12 months were deemed 50% responders. Of patients exposed to lacosamide ≥2 years, 3.1% remained seizure-free for a period ≥2 years.

SIGNIFICANCE

Long-term (up to 5 years) lacosamide treatment was generally well tolerated. The safety profile of lacosamide observed in this trial is consistent with that established in previous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Although the open-label trial design limits the analysis of efficacy, long-term reduction in seizure frequency and maintenance of efficacy was observed.

摘要

目的

评估拉科酰胺作为附加疗法在服用一至三种抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的部分发作性癫痫患者中的长期(长达 5 年)暴露安全性和疗效,这是一项开放标签扩展试验 SP756(NCT00522275)。

方法

完成双盲试验 SP754(NCT00136019)的患者有资格参加这项开放标签扩展试验(SP756)。在试验 SP754 结束时,患者已转换为拉科酰胺 200mg/天。随后允许调整拉科酰胺(100-800mg/天)和/或伴随的 AED 剂量,以优化耐受性和减少癫痫发作。评估治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)、生命体征、体重、临床实验室数据、心电图研究和癫痫发作频率。

主要发现

共有 308 名患者接受了开放标签拉科酰胺治疗,其中 138 名患者(44.8%)完成了长期试验。中位数模态剂量(定义为患者在治疗期间接受最长时间的每日拉科酰胺剂量)为 500mg/天。暴露于拉科酰胺>1、>2、>3 或>4 年的患者比例分别为 75%、63%、54%和 29%。停药的主要原因是疗效不佳(26%)和不良事件(11%)。常见的 TEAEs(≥15%)为头晕、头痛、挫伤、恶心、抽搐、鼻咽炎、跌倒、呕吐和复视。导致≥1.0%患者停药的 TEAEs 为头晕(1.6%)和抽搐(1.0%)。从试验 SP754 的基线开始,28 天癫痫发作频率的中位数降低百分比分别为 53.4%、55.2%、58.1%和 62.5%,分别为 1 年、2 年、3 年和 4 年的完成者。≥50%应答率分别为 52.8%、56.5%、58.7%和 62.5%,分别为 1 年、2 年、3 年和 4 年的完成者。8 名服用拉科酰胺单药治疗≥12 个月的患者中有 7 名被认为是 50%的应答者。在暴露于拉科酰胺≥2 年的患者中,有 3.1%的患者持续无癫痫发作≥2 年。

意义

长期(长达 5 年)拉科酰胺治疗通常具有良好的耐受性。本试验中观察到的拉科酰胺安全性与先前的双盲、安慰剂对照试验一致。尽管开放标签试验设计限制了疗效分析,但观察到长期的癫痫发作频率降低和疗效维持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验