Suppr超能文献

奥卡西平的安全性概况:处方事件监测研究的结果。

Safety profile of oxcarbazepine: results from a prescription-event monitoring study.

机构信息

Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):818-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02489.x. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To monitor safety of oxcarbazepine, prescribed in primary care in England, using prescription-event monitoring (PEM).

METHODS

Postmarketing surveillance using observational cohort technique of PEM. Exposure data were obtained from dispensed British National Health Service prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) March 2000-July 2003. Demographic, drug utilization, and clinical event data were collected from questionnaires posted to GPs at least 6 months after first prescription date for each patient. Incidence densities (IDs) (number of first reports per 1,000 patient-months of treatment) were calculated and differences for events reported in month 1 (ID(1)) and months 2-6 (ID(2-6)) (99% confidence intervals) were examined for changes in event rates. Follow-up and causality assessment of medically significant events were undertaken.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 2,243 patients [mean age 40.4 years; range 2-99 years; standard deviation (SD) 18.8; 46.3% (n = 1,038) male]. Most frequently reported primary indications were epilepsy, convulsion (n = 1,111; 49.5%, n = 209; 9.3%, respectively). GPs recorded 932 reasons for stopping medication in 698 (31.1%) patients; most frequent clinical reason "drowsiness/sedation" (n = 57; 2.5% of cohort). Clinical events (excluding indication) associated with starting treatment (lower 99% CI > 0) included: "drowsiness/sedation" (ID(1)-ID(2-6) = 14.2), "nausea/vomiting" (ID(1)-ID(2-6) = 13.0), and dizziness (ID(1)-ID(2-6) = 11.6). Events followed up and assessed as probably related to oxcarbazepine use included rash (7 of 11) and hyponatremia (15 of 38).

DISCUSSION

There were no serious adverse drug reactions reported during this study. Results of the study should be taken in context with other epidemiologic studies.

摘要

目的

利用上市后监测(PEM)监测在英格兰初级保健中开处的奥卡西平的安全性。

方法

采用 PEM 的观察队列技术进行上市后监测。暴露数据来自 2000 年 3 月至 2003 年 7 月期间全科医生(GP)开出的英国国民卫生服务(NHS)处方。从每位患者首次处方日期后至少 6 个月向 GP 寄出的问卷中收集人口统计学、药物使用和临床事件数据。计算发病率密度(IDs)(每 1000 患者-月治疗中首次报告的数量),并检查第 1 个月(ID(1))和第 2-6 个月(ID(2-6))报告的事件(99%置信区间)之间的差异,以检查事件发生率的变化。对有医学意义的事件进行随访和因果关系评估。

结果

该队列包括 2243 名患者[平均年龄 40.4 岁;范围 2-99 岁;标准差(SD)18.8;46.3%(n=1038)为男性]。最常报告的主要适应症是癫痫、抽搐(n=1111;49.5%,n=209;分别为 9.3%)。GP 在 698 名(31.1%)患者中记录了 932 个停药原因;最常见的临床原因是“嗜睡/镇静”(n=57;队列中 2.5%)。与开始治疗相关的临床事件(不包括适应症)(较低的 99%CI>0)包括:“嗜睡/镇静”(ID(1)-ID(2-6)=14.2)、“恶心/呕吐”(ID(1)-ID(2-6)=13.0)和头晕(ID(1)-ID(2-6)=11.6)。对可能与奥卡西平使用有关的事件进行了随访和评估,包括皮疹(11 例中的 7 例)和低钠血症(38 例中的 15 例)。

讨论

在本研究期间未报告严重药物不良反应。研究结果应结合其他流行病学研究进行考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验