Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3606-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911802107. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
When introduced or cultivated plants or animals hybridize with their native relatives, the spread of invasive genes into native populations might have biological, aesthetic, and legal implications. Models suggest that the rate of displacement of native by invasive alleles can be rapid and inevitable if they are favored by natural selection. We document the spread of a few introduced genes 90 km into a threatened native species (the California Tiger Salamander) in 60 years. Meanwhile, a majority of genetic markers (65 of 68) show little evidence of spread beyond the region where introductions occurred. Using computer simulations, we found that such a pattern is unlikely to emerge by chance among selectively neutral markers. Therefore, our results imply that natural selection has favored both the movement and fixation of these exceptional invasive alleles. The legal status of introgressed populations (native populations that are slightly genetically modified) is unresolved by the US Endangered Species Act. Our results illustrate that genetic and ecological factors need to be carefully weighed when considering different criteria for protection, because different rules could result in dramatically different geographic areas and numbers of individuals being protected.
当引入或栽培的植物或动物与其本地亲缘种杂交时,入侵基因向本地种群的传播可能具有生物学、美学和法律方面的影响。模型表明,如果入侵等位基因受到自然选择的青睐,那么它们取代本地等位基因的速度可能是迅速且不可避免的。我们记录了在 60 年内,少数几个引入基因在 90 公里范围内扩散到受威胁的本地物种(加利福尼亚虎蝾螈)的情况。与此同时,大多数遗传标记(68 个中的 65 个)几乎没有证据表明它们在引入区域之外传播。通过计算机模拟,我们发现,在选择性中性标记中,这种模式不太可能随机出现。因此,我们的结果表明,自然选择既有利于这些特殊的入侵等位基因的传播,也有利于它们的固定。美国濒危物种法案并未解决杂种群体(遗传上略有修改的本地群体)的法律地位问题。我们的结果表明,在考虑不同的保护标准时,需要仔细权衡遗传和生态因素,因为不同的规则可能导致受保护的地理区域和个体数量发生巨大变化。