• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Criteria for scientific evaluation of novel markers: a perspective.

作者信息

Moons Karel G M

机构信息

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2010 Apr;56(4):537-41. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.134155. Epub 2010 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2009.134155
PMID:20133890
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Criteria for scientific evaluation of novel markers: a perspective.新型标志物科学评估的标准：一种观点。
Clin Chem. 2010 Apr;56(4):537-41. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.134155. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
2
Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.心血管风险新标志物评估标准：美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2009 May 5;119(17):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
3
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
4
2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2010年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会无症状成年人心血管风险评估指南：美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):e584-636. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182051b4c. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
5
2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2010年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会无症状成年人心血管风险评估指南：执行摘要：美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):2748-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182051bab. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
6
Clinical and translational science in cardiovascular research: highlights from the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2017: Changing view on the concept of cardiovascular risk and blood pressure targets.心血管研究中的临床与转化科学：2017年美国心脏协会科学会议亮点：对心血管风险概念和血压目标的观念转变
Cardiovasc Res. 2018 Jan 1;114(1):e6-e8. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx233.
7
Imaging highlights of the American Heart Association 2007 scientific sessions.美国心脏协会2007年科学会议的影像学亮点。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar;1(2):252-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.012.
8
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 2: Preparticipation Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Competitive Athletes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.心血管异常竞技运动员的资格与取消资格建议：特别工作组2：竞技运动员心血管疾病的赛前筛查：美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会的科学声明
Circulation. 2015 Dec 1;132(22):e267-72. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000238. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Telemedicine in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.儿科心脏病学中的远程医疗：美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2017 Mar 14;135(11):e648-e678. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000478. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular risk factors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.减肥手术与心血管危险因素：美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2011 Apr 19;123(15):1683-701. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182149099. Epub 2011 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Design-related bias in studies investigating diagnostic tests for venous thromboembolic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关于静脉血栓栓塞性疾病诊断试验研究中的设计相关偏倚：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 29;11:1420000. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1420000. eCollection 2024.
2
Biomarkers as Prognostic Predictors and Therapeutic Guide in Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Evidence.生物标志物作为危重症患者的预后预测指标和治疗指南：临床证据
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 15;13(2):333. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020333.
3
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.
定义识别成人和儿童乳糜泻的最佳策略：系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.
4
A Systematic Review of Polygenic Models for Predicting Drug Outcomes.预测药物疗效的多基因模型的系统评价
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 27;12(9):1394. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091394.
5
Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to aid coeliac disease diagnosis in primary care: An observational study.用于辅助初级保健中乳糜泻诊断的临床预测模型的开发与外部验证：一项观察性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 7;46:101376. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101376. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Rational development and application of biomarkers in the field of autoimmunity: A conceptual framework guiding clinicians and researchers.自身免疫领域生物标志物的合理开发与应用：指导临床医生和研究人员的概念框架
J Transl Autoimmun. 2022 Mar 6;5:100151. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100151. eCollection 2022.
7
Toward Alignment in the Reporting of Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers: The AGREEDT Checklist.迈向诊断测试和生物标志物经济评估报告的一致性：AGREEDT 清单。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Oct;38(7):778-788. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18797590.
8
The early economic evaluation of novel biomarkers to accelerate their translation into clinical applications.新型生物标志物的早期经济评估，以加速其转化为临床应用。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jun 18;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0105-z. eCollection 2018.
9
A methodology review on the incremental prognostic value of computed tomography biomarkers in addition to Framingham risk score in predicting cardiovascular disease: the use of association, discrimination and reclassification.除弗雷明汉风险评分外，计算机断层扫描生物标志物在预测心血管疾病中的增量预后价值的方法学综述：关联、鉴别和重新分类的应用
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Feb 21;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0777-5.
10
Impact of Modified Transesophageal Echocardiography on Mortality and Stroke after Cardiac Surgery: A Large Cohort Study.改良经食管超声心动图对心脏手术后死亡率和卒中的影响：一项大型队列研究
Int J Vasc Med. 2017;2017:1857069. doi: 10.1155/2017/1857069. Epub 2017 Sep 11.