Suppr超能文献

“清洁”到底有多清洁?工作场所服装和个人防护设备的法规和标准。

How clean is "clean"? Regulations and standards for workplace clothing and personal protective equipment.

机构信息

Department of Fire Science and Professional Studies, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06510, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Feb;52(2):190-6. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cc55e1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compile current regulations and advisory recommendations on cleanliness of worker clothing and personal protective equipment and to evaluate the adequacy of criteria for determining whether cleanliness has been achieved.

METHODS

Systematic review of information provided by federal agencies (eg, OSHA, MSHA, and NIOSH), nongovernmental advisory bodies (eg, ACGIH, AIHA, and ANSI), and manufacturers of protective clothing and equipment.

RESULTS

We identified an array of terms describing "cleanliness" and the processes for achieving "cleanliness" that were almost never defined in regulations and recommendations. We also found a general lack of criteria for determining whether cleanliness and/or sterility have been achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

There is need to harmonize cleanliness-related terminology, establish best practices for equipment cleaning and sterilization, implement a signage systems to provide equipment-specific cleaning instructions, and adopt objective criteria for determining what is "clean."

摘要

目的

整理关于工人服装和个人防护设备清洁度的现行规定和建议,并评估确定是否达到清洁度的标准是否充分。

方法

对联邦机构(例如 OSHA、MSHA 和 NIOSH)、非政府咨询机构(例如 ACGIH、AIHA 和 ANSI)以及防护服装和设备制造商提供的信息进行系统审查。

结果

我们确定了一系列描述“清洁度”和实现“清洁度”的过程的术语,但这些术语在法规和建议中几乎从未定义过。我们还发现,缺乏确定是否已达到清洁度和/或无菌性的一般标准。

结论

需要协调与清洁度相关的术语,为设备清洁和消毒制定最佳实践,实施标识系统以提供设备特定的清洁说明,并采用客观标准来确定什么是“清洁”。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验