Niethard M, Deja M, Rogalski M
Klinik für Orthopädie, Abt Kinderorthopädie, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Mar;148(2):215-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240732.
Angular deformities of the lower extremity are considered as prearthrotic factors. Osteotomy is regarded as a way of corrective treatment. But this intervention is considered as complex and requires a special after-treatment. During childhood and with remaining growth, guided growth offers an elegant solution for this problem. Resulting in a temporary hemiepiphyseodesis, the eight-Plate offers an alternative technique besides the Blount staples and the definitive epiphyseodesis. We evaluated the effect of this device on the correction of angular deformities in children with different diagnoses and at different ages.
Since 04/2006 22 patients with angular deformities of the lower extremities due to different diagnoses were treated at our department with the eight-Plate (42 eight-Plates). In this study we evaluated the outcome of 13 patients (26 eight-Plates) until the completed angular correction and removal of the eight-Plate. A special treatment after plate removal was not applied.
All patients improved their mechanical leg axis. The average age at implantation was 9.4 years (2.3-13.7 years). The average time until plate removal was 10.7 months (6-34 months). No hardware failures, extrusions, growth arrests, wound infections or other complications were observed. Two patients did not achieve the desired axis correction because of insufficient remaining growth potential. An additional surgical intervention was realised. The average correction of the study group regarding the mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 22 mm (6-43 mm) and 10.6 degrees (5-27 degrees) regarding the angular correction of the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFW). The mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTW) changed by 8.0 degrees (3-15 degrees).
In our opinion the eight-Plate seems to be a safe and reliable device for guided growth of angular deformities around the knee. The technique is easy to learn and the complication rate low compared to the staple technique. A special after-treatment is not needed and there is only minor operative trauma. At present there are only few data on long-term follow-up after plate removal until skeletal maturity. The definition of the ideal point in time for plate removal is still open.
下肢角畸形被视为关节前期因素。截骨术被视为一种矫正治疗方法。但这种干预被认为较为复杂,且需要特殊的术后治疗。在儿童期且仍有生长潜力时,引导性生长为该问题提供了一种巧妙的解决方案。导致暂时性半骨骺阻滞,八钢板除了布朗特钉和确定性骨骺阻滞术外提供了另一种技术。我们评估了该装置对不同诊断和不同年龄儿童角畸形矫正的效果。
自2006年4月起,我们科室使用八钢板(42块八钢板)治疗了22例因不同诊断导致下肢角畸形的患者。在本研究中,我们评估了13例患者(26块八钢板)直至完成角矫正和取出八钢板的结果。取出钢板后未进行特殊治疗。
所有患者的下肢力学轴线均得到改善。植入时的平均年龄为9.4岁(2.3 - 13.7岁)。直至取出钢板的平均时间为10.7个月(6 - 34个月)。未观察到内固定失败、植入物脱出、生长停滞、伤口感染或其他并发症。两名患者由于剩余生长潜力不足未达到预期的轴线矫正,进行了额外的手术干预。研究组关于力学轴线偏差(MAD)的平均矫正为22毫米(6 - 43毫米),关于股骨远端外侧角(mLDFW)角矫正为10.6度(5 - 27度)。胫骨近端内侧角(mMPTW)改变了8.0度(3 - 15度)。
我们认为八钢板似乎是一种用于膝关节周围角畸形引导性生长的安全可靠装置。该技术易于学习,与钉技术相比并发症发生率低。无需特殊的术后治疗,手术创伤小。目前关于取出钢板后直至骨骼成熟的长期随访数据较少。取出钢板的理想时间点仍不明确。