Zhao Bin, Dong Shu-Ting, Wang Kong-Jun, Zhang Ji-Wang, Liu Peng
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Nov;20(11):2678-84.
A field experiment with colophony-coated fertilizer (CRF) and sulfur-coated fertilizer (SCF) showed that under the same application rates of N, P and K, applying CRF and SCF increased the summer maize grain yield by 13.15% and 14.15%, respectively, compared to the application of common compound fertilizer CCF. When the applied amount of CRF and SCF was decreased by 25%, the yield increment was 9.69% and 10.04%, respectively; and when the applied amount of CRF and SCF was decreased by 50%, the yield had less difference with that under CCF application. The field ammonia volatilization rate in treatments CRF and SCF increased slowly, with a peak appeared 7 days later than that in treatment CCF, and the total amount of ammonia volatilization in treatments CRF and SCF was ranged from 0.78 kg N x hm(-2) to 4.43 kg N x hm(-2), with a decrement of 51.34%-91.34% compared to that in treatment CCF. The fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency of CRF and SCF were also significantly higher than those of CCF.
一项关于树脂包膜肥料(CRF)和硫包膜肥料(SCF)的田间试验表明,在相同氮、磷、钾施用量的情况下,与施用普通复合肥(CCF)相比,施用CRF和SCF分别使夏玉米籽粒产量提高了13.15%和14.15%。当CRF和SCF的施用量减少25%时,产量增幅分别为9.69%和10.04%;当CRF和SCF的施用量减少50%时,产量与施用CCF时的差异较小。CRF和SCF处理的田间氨挥发速率增加缓慢,峰值出现时间比CCF处理晚7天,CRF和SCF处理的氨挥发总量在0.78 kg N·hm(-2)至4.43 kg N·hm(-2)之间,与CCF处理相比减少了51.34% - 91.34%。CRF和SCF的肥料氮利用效率和农学氮利用效率也显著高于CCF。