Department of Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Oct 1;78(2):513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.024. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
The optimal preparative regimen for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is unknown. We compared a total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimen with a chemotherapy-alone regimen.
A retrospective cohort study was performed at a Canadian cancer center. The TBI regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and TBI 12 Gy in six fractions (CY/E/TBI). The chemotherapy-alone regimen consisted of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM). We compared the acute and long-term toxicities, disease relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS).
Of 73 patients, 26 received CY/E/TBI and 47 received BEAM. The median follow-up for the CY/E/TBI group was 12.0 years and for the BEAM group was 7.3 years. After PBSCT, no differences in acute toxicity were seen between the two groups. The 5-year disease relapse-free survival rate was 50.0% and 50.7% in the CY/E/TBI and BEAM groups, respectively (p = .808). The 5-year OS rate was 53.9% and 63.8% for the CY/E/TBI and BEAM groups, respectivey (p = .492). The univariate analysis results indicated that patients with Stage IV, with chemotherapy-resistant disease, and who had received PBSCT before 2000 had inferior OS. A three-way categorical analysis revealed that transplantation before 2000, rather than the conditioning regimen, was a more important predictive factor of long-term outcome (p = .034).
A 12-Gy TBI-based conditioning regimen for PBSCT for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma resulted in disease relapse-free survival and OS similar to that after BEAM. PBSCT before 2000, and not the conditioning regimen, was an important predictor of long-term outcomes. TBI was not associated with more acute toxicity or pneumonitis. We found no indication that the TBI regimen was inferior or superior to BEAM.
接受自体外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT)的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的最佳预备方案尚不清楚。我们比较了全身照射(TBI)为基础的方案与单纯化疗方案。
在加拿大癌症中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。TBI 方案包括环磷酰胺、依托泊苷和 TBI 12Gy 分 6 次(CY/E/TBI)。单纯化疗方案包括卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和马法兰(BEAM)。我们比较了急性和长期毒性、疾病无复发生存率和总生存率(OS)。
在 73 例患者中,26 例接受 CY/E/TBI,47 例接受 BEAM。CY/E/TBI 组的中位随访时间为 12.0 年,BEAM 组为 7.3 年。PBSCT 后,两组之间的急性毒性无差异。CY/E/TBI 和 BEAM 组的 5 年疾病无复发生存率分别为 50.0%和 50.7%(p=0.808)。CY/E/TBI 和 BEAM 组的 5 年 OS 率分别为 53.9%和 63.8%(p=0.492)。单因素分析结果表明,IV 期患者、化疗耐药患者以及 2000 年前接受 PBSCT 的患者 OS 较差。三分类分析显示,2000 年前的移植而非预处理方案是长期预后的更重要预测因素(p=0.034)。
对于非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的 PBSCT,12Gy TBI 为基础的预处理方案可获得与 BEAM 相似的疾病无复发生存率和 OS。2000 年前的 PBSCT,而不是预处理方案,是长期预后的重要预测因素。TBI 与更多的急性毒性或肺炎无关。我们没有发现 TBI 方案比 BEAM 方案差或好的迹象。