Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, and Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
BMJ. 2010 Feb 5;340:c249. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c249.
To assess whether use of the antidepressant venlafaxine is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death or near death compared with other commonly used antidepressants.
Population based observational study.
We did a nested case-control analysis within a new user cohort formed using the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database.
New users of venlafaxine, fluoxetine, citalopram, or dosulepin on or after 1 January 1995, aged 18 to 89 years, with a diagnosis of depression or anxiety. Participants were followed-up until February 2005, or the occurrence of sudden cardiac death or near death, identified from medical records indicating non-fatal acute ventricular tachyarrhythmia, sudden death due to cardiac causes, or out of hospital deaths from acute ischaemic cardiac events. For each case, 30 controls were selected matched for age, sex, calendar time, and indication. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of sudden cardiac death or near death associated with current use of venlafaxine compared with current use of fluoxetine, citalopram or dosulepin.
207 384 participants were followed-up for an average of 3.3 years. There were 568 cases of sudden cardiac death or near death, which were matched to 14 812 controls. The adjusted odds ratio of sudden cardiac death or near death associated with venlafaxine use was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.14) relative to fluoxetine use, whereas compared with citalopram it was 0.89 (0.50 to 1.60) and with dosulepin 0.83 (0.46 to 1.52).
In this large, population based study, the use of venlafaxine was not associated with an excess risk of sudden cardiac death or near death compared with fluoxetine, dosulepin, or citalopram, in patients with depression or anxiety.
评估与其他常用抗抑郁药相比,使用抗抑郁药文拉法辛是否会增加突发心脏死亡或接近死亡的风险。
基于人群的观察性研究。
我们在英国全科医生研究数据库中创建的新用户队列内进行了嵌套病例对照分析。
1995 年 1 月 1 日或之后开始使用文拉法辛、氟西汀、西酞普兰或多塞平的新用户,年龄在 18 至 89 岁之间,诊断为抑郁症或焦虑症。参与者随访至 2005 年 2 月,或发生突发心脏死亡或接近死亡,通过医疗记录确定非致命性急性室性心律失常、心脏原因导致的猝死或急性缺血性心脏事件导致的院外死亡。每例病例选择 30 名年龄、性别、日历时间和适应证匹配的对照。我们使用条件逻辑回归计算当前使用文拉法辛与当前使用氟西汀、西酞普兰或多塞平相比突发心脏死亡或接近死亡的调整比值比。
207384 名参与者平均随访 3.3 年。发生 568 例突发心脏死亡或接近死亡,与 14812 名对照匹配。与氟西汀相比,文拉法辛使用与突发心脏死亡或接近死亡相关的调整比值比为 0.66(95%置信区间 0.38 至 1.14),而与西酞普兰相比为 0.89(0.50 至 1.60),与多塞平相比为 0.83(0.46 至 1.52)。
在这项大型基于人群的研究中,与氟西汀、多塞平或西酞普兰相比,患有抑郁症或焦虑症的患者使用文拉法辛与突发心脏死亡或接近死亡的风险增加无关。