Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Aug;42(8):1454-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d1fdb3.
This study aimed to (a) examine the influence of type I diabetes on the cardiopulmonary exercise response in trained subjects and (b) determine whether glycemic control affects these responses.
The cardiopulmonary responses to maximal incremental cycle ergometry were compared in 12 Ironman triathletes with type I diabetes and 10 age- and sex-matched control subjects without diabetes. Athletes with type I diabetes were then stratified into low- (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7%, n = 5) and high-HbA1c (HbA1c > 7%, n = 7) groups for comparison. Cardiac output, stroke volume, arterial blood pressure, and calculated systemic vascular resistance along with airway function were measured at rest and during steady-state exercise.
During peak exercise HR, stroke volume and cardiac output were not different between the groups with and without diabetes; however, forced expiratory flow at 50% of the forced vital capacity was lower in subjects with diabetes (P < 0.05). Within the group with diabetes, HbA1c was lower in the low-HbA1c versus high-HbA1c group (6.5 +/- 0.3 vs 7.8 +/- 0.4, respectively; P < 0.05), but training volume was not different. At rest, the low-HbA1c group had greater cardiac output and lower systemic vascular resistance than the high-HbA1c group, and all pulmonary function measurements were greater in the low-HbA1c group (P < 0.05). During peak exercise, the VO2, workload, HR, stroke volume, and cardiac output were greater in the low-HbA1c versus the high-HbA1c group (P < 0.05). In addition, all indices of pulmonary function were higher in the low-HbA1c group (P < 0.05). Finally, within the subjects with diabetes, there was a weak inverse correlation between HbA1c and exercise training volume (r2 = -0.352) and stroke volume (r2 = -0.339). These data suggest that highly trained individuals with type I diabetes can achieve the same cardiopulmonary exercise responses as trained subjects without diabetes, but these responses are reduced by poor glycemic control.
本研究旨在:(a)探讨 1 型糖尿病对训练有素受试者心肺运动反应的影响;(b)确定血糖控制是否会影响这些反应。
比较 12 名参加铁人三项的 1 型糖尿病运动员和 10 名年龄和性别匹配的无糖尿病对照组的最大递增式踏车运动心肺反应。然后,根据糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平将 1 型糖尿病运动员分为低 HbA1c(HbA1c<7%,n=5)和高 HbA1c(HbA1c>7%,n=7)组进行比较。在休息和稳定状态运动期间测量心输出量、每搏量、动脉血压和计算的全身血管阻力以及气道功能。
在峰值运动时,糖尿病组和无糖尿病组的 HR、每搏量和心输出量没有差异;然而,糖尿病组的用力呼气流量在 50%用力肺活量时较低(P<0.05)。在糖尿病组内,低 HbA1c 组的 HbA1c 低于高 HbA1c 组(分别为 6.5±0.3 与 7.8±0.4;P<0.05),但训练量无差异。在休息时,低 HbA1c 组的心输出量较大,全身血管阻力较低,所有肺功能测量值均高于高 HbA1c 组(P<0.05)。在峰值运动时,低 HbA1c 组的 VO2、工作量、HR、每搏量和心输出量均高于高 HbA1c 组(P<0.05)。此外,低 HbA1c 组的所有肺功能指标均较高(P<0.05)。最后,在糖尿病患者中,HbA1c 与运动训练量(r2=-0.352)和每搏量(r2=-0.339)呈弱负相关。这些数据表明,患有 1 型糖尿病的训练有素个体可以获得与无糖尿病训练有素个体相同的心肺运动反应,但血糖控制不佳会降低这些反应。