Barbosa Paulo Faria, Malafaia Osvaldo, Ribas-Filho Jurandir Marcondes, Czeczko Nicolau Gregori, Ribas Carmen Marcondes, Cuenca Ronaldo Mafia, Chula Domingos Candiota
Instituto de Pesquisas Médicas, Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná, Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, BR.
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009 Dec;36(6):498-503. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912009000600007.
To quantify the percentage of immunostaining through the labeling index as well as the optical density of Ki-67 and CD34 in prostate adenocarcinoma and compare the results between markers.
Markers Ki-67 and CD34 were studied using immunohistochemistry in 34 cases of prostate adenocarcinoma from radical prostatectomies performed at the Hospital Regional do Gama in Brasilia, Brazil from 2000 through 2005. Those markers were quantified using the SAMBA 4000 software - Automated Scanning Microscopic Analysis System - and the IMMUNO software in the analysis of the variables labeling index and optical density. Spearman's correlation coefficient was estimated in order to evaluate the association between the expression levels of the markers. For the comparison of lesion types, Student's paired t-test and the nonparametric Wilcoxon test were used.
Of the 34 blocks referred for the study of the tumor markers, 15 were positive for Ki-67, 34 showed CD34 expression, and 14 were positive for both markers. The median value for the labeling index of CD34 was 72.72%; the minimum was 5.14% and the maximum, 88.81%. The median for the Ki-67 labeling index was 73.78%, while the minimum was 16.87%, and the maximum, 87.47%. The median value for the optical density of CD34 was 48.33, the minimum was 35.65 and the maximum, 85.86. For the optical density of Ki-67, the median was 40.03, while the minimum and maximum values were 21.53 and 52.43, respectively.
The cytophotometric expression of Ki-67 had a mean labeling index of 64.04%, and the mean CD34 labeling index was 61.64%. The cytophotometric expression of the mean optical density of Ki-67 was 39.49, while for CD34 it was 53.69. There was a significant difference between Ki-67 and CD34 immunostaining with respect to optical density (P=0.025); no significant difference occurred regarding labeling index (P=0.470).
通过标记指数以及Ki-67和CD34的光密度来量化免疫染色的百分比,并比较各标记物之间的结果。
对2000年至2005年在巴西巴西利亚伽马地区医院进行的34例前列腺癌根治术病例,采用免疫组织化学方法研究Ki-67和CD34标记物。使用SAMBA 4000软件(自动扫描显微镜分析系统)和IMMUNO软件对标记指数和光密度变量进行分析,对这些标记物进行量化。估计Spearman相关系数以评估标记物表达水平之间的关联。对于病变类型的比较,使用配对t检验和非参数Wilcoxon检验。
在送检肿瘤标记物研究的34个组织块中,15个Ki-67呈阳性,34个显示CD34表达,14个两种标记物均呈阳性。CD34标记指数的中位数为72.72%;最小值为5.14%,最大值为88.81%。Ki-67标记指数的中位数为73.78%,最小值为16.87%,最大值为87.47%。CD34光密度的中位数为48.33,最小值为35.65,最大值为85.86。Ki-67光密度的中位数为40.03,最小值和最大值分别为21.53和52.43。
Ki-67的细胞光度法表达的平均标记指数为64.04%,CD34的平均标记指数为61.64%。Ki-67平均光密度的细胞光度法表达为39.49,而CD34为53.69。Ki-67和CD34免疫染色在光密度方面存在显著差异(P = 0.025);在标记指数方面无显著差异(P = 0.470)。