Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Psychology, Dr. Jan van Breemen Institute, Dr Jan van Breemenstraat 2, NL-1056 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):111-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0492.
Evidence-based treatment is not effective for all patients. Research must therefore be carried out to help clinicians to decide for whom and under what circumstances certain treatment is effective. Treatment theory can assist in designing research that will provide results on which clinical decision-making can be based.
To illustrate how treatment theory can be helpful in the design of explanatory trials that assist clinical decision-making.
The benefit of treatment theory was demonstrated by approaching the design of a clinical trial from two perspectives: one without the use of treatment theory and one with the explicit use of treatment theory. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cognitive treatment of illness perceptions for patients with chronic low back pain was used as an illustrative example.
With treatment theory as the main focus, the intervention became the starting point for the design of an explanatory trial. Potentially relevant patient selection criteria, essential treatment components, the optimal choice of a control group and the selection of outcome measures were specified.
This paper not only describes problems encountered in research on the effectiveness of treatment, but also ways in which to address these problems.
循证治疗并非对所有患者都有效。因此,必须开展研究,帮助临床医生确定哪些患者在何种情况下适合采用哪种治疗方法。治疗理论有助于设计能够提供临床决策依据的研究结果。
举例说明治疗理论如何有助于设计有助于临床决策的解释性试验。
通过从两个角度探讨临床试验设计来展示治疗理论的益处:一种是不使用治疗理论,另一种是明确使用治疗理论。以慢性腰痛患者疾病认知的认知治疗的有效性评估为例。
以治疗理论为主要关注点,干预措施成为设计解释性试验的起点。明确了潜在相关的患者选择标准、基本治疗要素、对照组的最佳选择以及结果测量指标的选择。
本文不仅描述了治疗效果研究中遇到的问题,还提出了解决这些问题的方法。