Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, P.O. Box 164, Espinardo, Murcia 30100, Spain.
Food Microbiol. 2010 Apr;27(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
Chlorine dioxide (ClO(2)) has been postulated as an alternative to sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) for fresh-cut produce sanitization to avoid risks associated with chlorination by-products. Experiments were performed to determine the prevention of cross-contamination of fresh-cut lettuce by Escherichia coli using chlorine dioxide (3 mg/L) or sodium hypochlorite (100 mg/L) as sanitation agents. The efficacy of these sanitation solutions was evaluated simulating as much as possible the conditions of a fresh-cut processing line. Thus, to evaluate the potential risk of cross-contamination during pre-washing, inoculated fresh-cut lettuce was pre-washed and after that non-inoculated lettuce was then pre-washed in the same water. After this pre-washing, non-inoculated lettuce was cross-contaminated, changing from 0 to 3.4 log units of E. coli cells. During washing with sanitizers, none of the tested sanitation agents significantly reduced E. coli counts in both inoculated and cross-contaminated lettuce. These results suggest that when cross-contamination occurs, even if the event is recent, subsequent sanitation steps are inefficient for inactivating E. coli cells on the vegetable tissue. However, chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite solutions were able to inactivate most E. coli cells that passed from inoculated product to wash water. Therefore, they might be able to avoid cross-contamination between clean and contaminated product during the washing step. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs indicated that bacterial cells were mainly located in clusters or tissue stomata where they might be protected, which explains the low efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide solutions observed in this study.
二氧化氯(ClO2)被认为是替代次氯酸钠(NaClO)用于鲜切农产品消毒的一种选择,以避免与氯化副产物相关的风险。进行了实验以确定使用二氧化氯(3mg/L)或次氯酸钠(100mg/L)作为卫生处理剂来防止大肠杆菌对鲜切生菜的交叉污染。这些卫生处理溶液的功效是通过尽可能模拟鲜切加工线的条件来评估的。因此,为了评估预洗过程中交叉污染的潜在风险,将接种的鲜切生菜进行预洗,然后用相同的水对未接种的生菜进行预洗。预洗后,未接种的生菜发生了交叉污染,大肠杆菌细胞数从 0 增加到 3.4 个对数单位。在使用消毒剂进行洗涤时,测试的消毒剂均未显著降低接种和交叉污染生菜中的大肠杆菌计数。这些结果表明,当发生交叉污染时,即使是最近发生的事件,随后的卫生处理步骤对于在蔬菜组织上灭活大肠杆菌细胞也是无效的。然而,二氧化氯和次氯酸钠溶液能够灭活从接种产品转移到洗涤水中的大多数大肠杆菌细胞。因此,它们可能能够在洗涤步骤中避免清洁产品和污染产品之间的交叉污染。扫描电子显微镜照片表明,细菌细胞主要位于簇或组织气孔中,这些细胞可能受到保护,这解释了本研究中观察到的次氯酸钠和二氧化氯溶液效率较低的原因。