Suppr超能文献

社区教学医院中大查房讲座的效果。

The effectiveness of grand rounds lectures in a community-based teaching hospital.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85008, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;66(6):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of weekly didactic grand rounds presentations.

DESIGN

From 26 consecutive grand rounds presentations from July 2007 to March 2008, 2 questions were created from each lecture. A 52-question multiple choice test was administered 2 weeks after the completion of the last presentation.

SETTING

A tertiary care institution with an accredited surgical residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

Attending surgeons, residents, midlevel providers, and medical students participated in the multiple choice test.

RESULTS

A total of 58 participants completed the test. The mean score was 41.5% (range, 12-69%). The senior residents had the highest mean score on the test with 51.0% (p = 0.021). With regard to global versus specific questions, there was no significant difference between the mean percentage of correct answers (41.7% vs 41.3%, respectively, p = 0.79). The great majority (76.5%) of participants indicated that they preferred to have grand rounds given by "distinguished guest speakers." The mean score on presentations by guest speakers, however, was slightly lower than for other presenters (40.7% vs 42.2%, p= 0.37). Questions from presentations by resident physicians were answered correctly significantly more often than presentations by attending surgeons (45.9% vs 39.6%, p = 0.001). Trauma and burn are considered areas of focus for this surgical residency. There was no significant difference between mean score on topics related to trauma and burn compared with other topics (40.6% vs 41.8%, p = 0.50). Attendance had very little correlation with scores on the test (correlation coefficient, 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 40% of material presented at grand rounds was retained within a 9 month period. Although this number seems low, this information was recalled without preparation. Despite the preference for distinguished guest speakers, there was no significant additional gain in knowledge from their expertise. Presentations from senior residents were the most successful in conveying information.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定每周专题学术报告会的效果。

设计

从 2007 年 7 月至 2008 年 3 月的 26 次专题学术报告会中,每次讲座提出 2 个问题。在最后一次报告完成后 2 周进行 52 个多项选择题测试。

地点

一家拥有认证外科住院医师培训计划的三级保健机构。

参与者

主治外科医生、住院医师、中级医护人员和医学生参加了多项选择题测试。

结果

共有 58 名参与者完成了测试。平均得分为 41.5%(范围 12-69%)。高级住院医师的测试得分最高,为 51.0%(p=0.021)。就整体问题与具体问题而言,正确答案的平均百分比之间没有显著差异(分别为 41.7%和 41.3%,p=0.79)。绝大多数(76.5%)参与者表示他们更喜欢由“杰出客座演讲者”主持的学术报告会。然而,客座演讲者的平均得分略低于其他演讲者(40.7%比 42.2%,p=0.37)。住院医师医生的演讲中提出的问题比主治外科医生的演讲中提出的问题回答正确的频率显著更高(45.9%比 39.6%,p=0.001)。创伤和烧伤被认为是该外科住院医师培训的重点领域。与其他主题相比,与创伤和烧伤相关的主题的平均分数没有显著差异(40.6%比 41.8%,p=0.50)。出席率与测试得分的相关性非常低(相关系数为 0.004)。

结论

在 9 个月的时间内,大约有 40%的专题学术报告会内容被保留下来。尽管这个数字看起来很低,但这些信息是在没有准备的情况下回忆起来的。尽管人们更喜欢杰出的客座演讲者,但他们的专业知识并没有带来明显的额外知识收获。高级住院医师的演讲在传达信息方面最为成功。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验