• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接将接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的转移患者送返的安全性和可行性。

The safety and feasibility of immediately returning patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2009 Nov;5(5):599-603. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i5a96.

DOI:10.4244/eijv5i5a96
PMID:20142181
Abstract

AIMS

To describe the safety of immediate retransfer to community hospitals following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a cohort of 246 consecutive patients transferred to a tertiary institution who all underwent primary or rescue PCI, 166 (67%) were immediately retransferred back. The retransfer occurred only if they were haemodynamically stable and had undergone an uncomplicated procedure. In-hospital adverse events were assessed in each referral hospital. Patients had a mean age of 59 years, presented an anterior MI in 39%, and 91% were in Killip class 1. In this cohort, 75% of patients underwent primary PCI and 25% received rescue PCI. A transradial approach was used in 74% of patients. During ambulance transport back to the referral hospital, no adverse events occurred. In-hospital outcomes were favourable, with low death (2.4%), reinfarction (3.6%) and stroke (1.2%) rates. TIMI major bleeding occurred in 1.8% (catheter-related in 0.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this carefully selected population of STEMI patients, immediate retransfer to the referral hospital following primary or rescue PCI is feasible in more than 2/3 of patients and associated with a low risk of major clinical adverse events.

摘要

目的

描述直接转至社区医院在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的安全性。

方法和结果

在一项连续 246 例转至三级机构的患者队列中,所有患者均接受了直接或补救性 PCI,其中 166 例(67%)立即转回。仅在血流动力学稳定且手术过程简单的情况下才会进行转院。在每个转诊医院评估住院期间的不良事件。患者的平均年龄为 59 岁,前壁心肌梗死占 39%,91%的患者为 Killip 1 级。在该队列中,75%的患者接受了直接 PCI,25%的患者接受了补救性 PCI。74%的患者采用经桡动脉入路。在救护车返回转诊医院的途中,未发生不良事件。住院期间的结局良好,死亡率(2.4%)、再梗死率(3.6%)和卒中率(1.2%)均较低。TIMI 大出血发生率为 1.8%(与导管相关的为 0.6%)。

结论

在这项精心选择的 STEMI 患者人群中,直接转至转诊医院行直接或补救性 PCI 是可行的,超过 2/3的患者可进行直接转院,且主要临床不良事件的风险较低。

相似文献

1
The safety and feasibility of immediately returning patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.直接将接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的转移患者送返的安全性和可行性。
EuroIntervention. 2009 Nov;5(5):599-603. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i5a96.
2
Reduced-dose fibrinolytic acceleration of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treatment coupled with urgent percutaneous coronary intervention compared to primary percutaneous coronary intervention alone results of the AMICO (Alliance for Myocardial Infarction Care Optimization) Registry.与单独进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,降低剂量纤溶加速ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗并联合紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的效果:AMICO(心肌梗死护理优化联盟)注册研究结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.009.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
4
Treatment delays in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.魁北克心肺研究所接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的治疗延迟情况。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl B(Suppl B):53B-57B. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71011-5.
5
Transfer for urgent percutaneous coronary intervention early after thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the TRANSFER-AMI pilot feasibility study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗后早期紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的转运:TRANSFER-AMI初步可行性研究
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Nov;22(13):1121-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70948-5.
6
Pre-hospital triage for primary angioplasty: direct referral to the intervention center versus interhospital transport.院前分诊行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与医院间转运比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.010.
7
Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.急性心肌梗死联合阿昔单抗瑞替普酶支架置入研究(CARESS-in-AMI)中直接血管成形术与溶栓后补救性血管成形术标准治疗的对比:一项开放、前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):559-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60268-8.
8
Comparison of early mortality of paramedic-diagnosed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with immediate transport to a designated primary percutaneous coronary intervention center to that of similar patients transported to the nearest hospital.医护人员诊断的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者立即转运至指定的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心与转运至最近医院的类似患者早期死亡率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 15;98(10):1329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.019. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
9
Impact of thrombus aspiration on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.血栓抽吸对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者血管造影及临床结局的影响
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Oct-Dec;11(4):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.05.005.
10
Interhospital transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内转院。
Am J Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):e189-92. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181a09d35.

引用本文的文献

1
Age and its relationship to acute coronary syndromes in the Saudi Project for Assessment of Coronary Events (SPACE) registry: The SPACE age study.沙特冠状动脉事件评估项目(SPACE)登记中年龄及其与急性冠状动脉综合征的关系:SPACE年龄研究
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2012 Jan;24(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Oct 19.