Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):409-16. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf863d.
Surgical trials pose many methodological challenges often not present in trials of medical interventions. If not properly accounted for, these challenges may introduce significant biases and threaten the validity of the results.
We systematically reviewed the significance of randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of surgical interventions, discussed the methodological challenges encountered in designing and conducting randomized controlled trials of surgical treatments, and proposed possible solutions to overcome these challenges.
Many barriers and issues of surgical trials affecting internal validity can be overcome with proper methodology, and in most cases these issues do not restrict their conduct. Researchers should consider their research question carefully and design a surgical trial that contains features appropriate for the question. In doing so, they must ensure that the trial is valid, feasible, and affordable--a difficult feat, but one well worth the challenge.
外科试验存在许多医学干预试验中通常不存在的方法学挑战。如果没有妥善考虑这些挑战,可能会引入严重的偏倚并威胁到结果的有效性。
我们系统地回顾了随机对照试验在评估外科干预中的重要性,讨论了设计和开展外科治疗随机对照试验中遇到的方法学挑战,并提出了可能的解决方案来克服这些挑战。
许多影响内部有效性的外科试验的障碍和问题可以通过适当的方法学来克服,在大多数情况下,这些问题不会限制它们的进行。研究人员应该仔细考虑他们的研究问题,并设计一个包含适合该问题的特征的外科试验。在这样做的过程中,他们必须确保试验是有效的、可行的和负担得起的——这是一项艰巨的任务,但值得挑战。