• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利瓦雷泽基于人群的 9.5 年队列研究:参加肺癌筛查的吸烟者的自我选择效应。

Self-selection effects in smokers attending lung cancer screening: a 9.5-year population-based cohort study in Varese, Italy.

机构信息

Center for Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Apr;5(4):428-35. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d2efc7.

DOI:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d2efc7
PMID:20142770
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We hypothesize that mortality risk profile of participants and nonparticipants in nonrandomized lung cancer (LC) screening of smokers may be different.

METHODS

In 1997, a population-based cohort of 5815 smokers of Varese Province was invited to nonrandomized LC screening by annual chest x-ray examination for 4 years. LC risk factors and screening participation rate were recorded. Except for screening, the whole cohort received usual care. After 9.5-year observation, we compared mortality of participants versus nonparticipants by assessing age-standardized all-cause mortality rate ratio (MRR) and disease group-specific MRR with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Self-selected screening participants were 21% of cohort. Participants were younger (p < 0.001), were more frequently current smokers (p = 0.019), had more pack-years of smoking (p < 0.0001), and had higher rate of LC family history (p < 0.0001) and of occupational LC risk (p < 0.0001) relative to nonparticipants. In logistic regression analysis familial LC, occupational risk and pack-years smoked were significant predictors of participation in screening and of developing LC. Participants displayed a healthy effect, as shown by all-cause MRR = 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53-0.84), all cancers except LC MRR = 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.91), cardiovascular diseases MRR = 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and noncancer disease other than cardiovascular or respiratory MRR = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.92). The LC mortality (MRR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.91) was higher in participants relative to nonparticipants (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

The selection effect in LC screening participants was dual: healthy effect and higher LC mortality. In assessing the overall effectiveness of LC screening on a population level, a higher LC mortality risk in participants should be considered.

摘要

背景

我们假设,在非随机肺癌(LC)筛查中,参与者和非参与者的死亡率风险特征可能不同。

方法

1997 年,对瓦雷泽省的一个基于人群的 5815 名吸烟者队列进行了邀请,参加为期 4 年的年度胸部 X 射线检查的非随机 LC 筛查。记录了 LC 的危险因素和筛查参与率。除了筛查之外,整个队列都接受了常规护理。经过 9.5 年的观察,我们通过评估年龄标准化全因死亡率比值(MRR)和疾病组特异性 MRR 及其 95%置信区间(95%CI),比较了参与者与非参与者的死亡率。

结果

自我选择参加筛查的参与者占队列的 21%。与非参与者相比,参与者更年轻(p < 0.001),更频繁地吸烟(p = 0.019),吸烟量更大(p < 0.0001),并且具有更高的 LC 家族史(p < 0.0001)和职业性 LC 风险(p < 0.0001)。在逻辑回归分析中,LC 家族史、职业风险和吸烟量是参与筛查和发生 LC 的显著预测因素。参与者表现出健康效应,全因死亡率 MRR = 0.67(95%CI,0.53-0.84),除 LC 外的所有癌症 MRR = 0.61(95%CI,0.41-0.91),心血管疾病 MRR = 0.38(95%CI,0.22-0.63),非心血管或呼吸系统疾病 MRR = 0.57(95%CI,0.34-0.92)。与非参与者相比,参与者的 LC 死亡率(MRR = 1.40;95%CI,1.03-1.91)更高(p = 0.031)。

结论

LC 筛查参与者的选择效应是双重的:健康效应和更高的 LC 死亡率。在评估人群水平上 LC 筛查的总体效果时,应该考虑参与者的更高 LC 死亡率风险。

相似文献

1
Self-selection effects in smokers attending lung cancer screening: a 9.5-year population-based cohort study in Varese, Italy.意大利瓦雷泽基于人群的 9.5 年队列研究:参加肺癌筛查的吸烟者的自我选择效应。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Apr;5(4):428-35. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d2efc7.
2
Assessment of lung cancer mortality reduction after chest X-ray screening in smokers: a population-based cohort study in Varese, Italy.意大利瓦雷泽基于人群队列研究:胸部 X 射线筛查对吸烟者肺癌死亡率降低的评估。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Apr;80(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
3
A 9-year follow-up study of participants and nonparticipants in sigmoidoscopy screening: importance of self-selection.一项针对乙状结肠镜筛查参与者和非参与者的9年随访研究:自我选择的重要性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1163-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2764.
4
A population-based cohort study of chest x-ray screening in smokers: lung cancer detection findings and follow-up.基于人群的吸烟者胸部 X 射线筛查队列研究:肺癌检出结果和随访。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jan 17;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-18.
5
Cost of a population-based programme of chest x-ray screening for lung cancer.基于人群的肺癌胸部X光筛查项目的成本。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2013 Jun;79(2):67-72. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2013.94.
6
Mortality, survival and incidence rates in the ITALUNG randomised lung cancer screening trial.ITALUNG 随机肺癌筛查试验中的死亡率、生存率和发病率。
Thorax. 2017 Sep;72(9):825-831. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209825. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Lung cancer screening in cigarette smokers in the province of Varese, Italy.意大利瓦雷泽省吸烟者的肺癌筛查。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2345-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2345::aid-cncr5>3.3.co;2-2.
8
The PRE.DI.CA. project for radiographic lung cancer screening in cigarette smokers.针对吸烟者进行肺癌影像学筛查的PRE.DI.CA.项目。
Rays. 2004 Oct-Dec;29(4):383-5.
9
Lung cancer screening CT-based prediction of cardiovascular events.基于 CT 的肺癌筛查对心血管事件的预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug;6(8):899-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
10
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.

引用本文的文献

1
New recommendation and coverage of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: uptake has increased but is still low.肺癌筛查低剂量计算机断层扫描的新推荐与覆盖情况:接受度有所提高但仍较低。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3338-9.
2
Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.肺癌筛查参与度:构建一个指导研究的概念模型
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2016 Nov 1;30(4):333-352. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.30.4.333.
3
Is chest X-ray screening for lung cancer in smokers cost-effective? Evidence from a population-based study in Italy.
吸烟者进行胸部X光肺癌筛查是否具有成本效益?来自意大利一项基于人群研究的证据。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015 Sep 12;13:15. doi: 10.1186/s12962-015-0041-0. eCollection 2015.
4
Comparing benefits from many possible computed tomography lung cancer screening programs: extrapolating from the National Lung Screening Trial using comparative modeling.比较多种可能的计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查方案的获益:使用比较模型从国家肺癌筛查试验进行推断。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e99978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099978. eCollection 2014.
5
Quality of life and healthcare use in a randomized controlled lung cancer screening study.一项随机对照肺癌筛查研究中的生活质量和医疗保健利用。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Aug;10(4):324-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201301-007OC.
6
Early lung cancer detection using the self-evaluation scoring questionnaire and chest digital radiography: a 3-year follow-up study in China.采用自评价评分问卷和胸部数字 X 线摄影进行早期肺癌检测:中国的 3 年随访研究。
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb;26(1):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9468-4.
7
A population-based cohort study of chest x-ray screening in smokers: lung cancer detection findings and follow-up.基于人群的吸烟者胸部 X 射线筛查队列研究:肺癌检出结果和随访。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jan 17;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-18.
8
Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States.美国肺癌计算机断层扫描筛查的成本效益。
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Nov;6(11):1841-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e59b3.
9
Volunteer effect and compromised randomization in the Mayo Project of screening for lung cancer. Mayo 肺癌筛查项目中的志愿者效应与随机分组受损。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;26(1):79-80. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9519-4. Epub 2010 Oct 23.