• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[拔除第一前磨牙对骨性I类患者垂直距离的影响]

[The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension in skeletal Class I patients].

作者信息

Fan Chun-xiang, Sun Rong, Wu Li-ping

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Shanghai Yueyang Hospital of Intergrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China.

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2009 Dec;18(6):592-5.

PMID:20143019
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the vertical changes in Class I patients treated with first premolar extraction and to compare these changes with those without extraction.

METHODS

Each group had 25 cases.One group was treated with first premolar extraction and the other without extraction. Lateral cephalograms were taken both pretreatment and posttreatment. All the films were traced and measured. To determine the vertical dimension changes due to treatment and to compare differences between the 2 groups, paired and unpaired t tests were performed with SPSS 16.0 software package, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in FH-MP, Yaxis, S-Go, S-Go/N-Me and ANS-Me/N-Me in both group after treatment. Both groups had increase in N-Me , but the change was comparatively greater in the extraction group. The extraction group showed more vertical movement of the mandibular first molars than the non-extraction group.Both groups showed mesial movement of the maxillary first molars and central incisors,but no significant difference was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups have increase in linear vertical dimensions. The changes in vertical dimension is greater in the extraction group, but there is no further change in the mandibular plane angle.

摘要

目的

评估拔除第一前磨牙治疗的安氏I类患者的垂直向变化,并将这些变化与未拔牙患者的变化进行比较。

方法

每组25例。一组采用拔除第一前磨牙治疗,另一组未拔牙。治疗前和治疗后均拍摄头颅侧位片。对所有片子进行描记和测量。为确定治疗引起的垂直维度变化并比较两组之间的差异,分别使用SPSS 16.0软件包进行配对和非配对t检验。

结果

治疗后两组的FH-MP、Y轴、S-Go、S-Go/N-Me和ANS-Me/N-Me均无显著差异。两组的N-Me均增加,但拔牙组的变化相对更大。拔牙组下颌第一磨牙的垂直移动比非拔牙组更多。两组上颌第一磨牙和中切牙均有近中移动,但未发现显著差异。

结论

两组的线性垂直维度均增加。拔牙组垂直维度的变化更大,但下颌平面角无进一步变化。

相似文献

1
[The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension in skeletal Class I patients].[拔除第一前磨牙对骨性I类患者垂直距离的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2009 Dec;18(6):592-5.
2
Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.对采用拔牙和未采用拔牙治疗的Ⅰ类患者牙颌面垂直变化的头影测量评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):869-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.041.
3
First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.拔除第一或第二前磨牙对面部垂直维度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):177-82. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0173:FOSPEE>2.0.CO;2.
4
A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment.第二磨牙与第一前磨牙拔除治疗结果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Nov;98(5):430-6. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81652-X.
5
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
6
Vertical changes following orthodontic extraction treatment in skeletal open bite subjects.骨性开颌患者正畸拔牙治疗后的垂直向变化
Eur J Orthod. 2002 Aug;24(4):407-16. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.4.407.
7
The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension.第一前磨牙拔除对垂直距离的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70301-x.
8
Keys to Class II correction: A comparison of 2 extraction protocols.二类错颌矫正关键:两种拔牙方案的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.018. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Vertical skeletal changes after extraction and non-extraction treatment in matched class I patients identified by a discriminant analysis: cephalometric appraisal and Procrustes superimposition.基于判别分析的匹配Ⅰ类患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后垂直骨骼变化:头影测量评估与 Procrustes 叠加。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 18;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0198-5.
10
Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.Begg固定矫治器治疗拔牙和非拔牙患者时不同支抗系统对垂直面部高度变化影响的评估:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):508-16. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm051.

引用本文的文献

1
Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.儿童牙齿拥挤的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 31;12(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2.