Ciemins Elizabeth L, Coon Patricia J, Fowles Jinnet Briggs, Min Sung-joon
Center for Clinical Translational Research, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT 59107-7000, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May 1;3(3):452-60. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300308.
Electronic health records (EHRs) have been implemented throughout the United States with varying degrees of success. Past EHR implementation experiences can inform health systems planning to initiate new or expand existing EHR systems. Key "critical success factors," e.g., use of disease registries, workflow integration, and real-time clinical guideline support, have been identified but not fully tested in practice.
A pre/postintervention cohort analysis was conducted on 495 adult patients selected randomly from a diabetes registry and followed for 6 years. Two intervention phases were evaluated: a "low-dose" period targeting primary care provider (PCP) and patient education followed by a "high-dose" EHR diabetes management implementation period, including a diabetes disease registry and office workflow changes, e.g., diabetes patient preidentification to facilitate real-time diabetes preventive care, disease management, and patient education.
Across baseline, "low-dose," and "high-dose" postintervention periods, a significantly greater proportion of patients (a) achieved American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for control of blood pressure (26.9 to 33.1 to 43.9%), glycosylated hemoglobin (48.5 to 57.5 to 66.8%), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (33.1 to 44.4 to 56.6%) and (b) received recommended preventive eye (26.2 to 36.4 to 58%), foot (23.4 to 40.3 to 66.9%), and renal (38.5 to 53.9 to 71%) examinations or screens.
Implementation of a fully functional, specialized EHR combined with tailored office workflow process changes was associated with increased adherence to ADA guidelines, including risk factor control, by PCPs and their patients with diabetes. Incorporation of previously identified "critical success factors" potentially contributed to the success of the program, as did use of a two-phase approach.
电子健康记录(EHRs)已在美国各地实施,成效各异。过去电子健康记录的实施经验可为卫生系统规划启动新的或扩展现有的电子健康记录系统提供参考。关键的“关键成功因素”,如疾病登记处的使用、工作流程整合和实时临床指南支持,已被确定,但在实践中尚未得到充分检验。
对从糖尿病登记处随机选取的495名成年患者进行干预前/后队列分析,并随访6年。评估了两个干预阶段:一个针对初级保健提供者(PCP)和患者教育的“低剂量”期,随后是一个“高剂量”电子健康记录糖尿病管理实施期,包括糖尿病疾病登记处和办公室工作流程的改变,如糖尿病患者预识别,以促进实时糖尿病预防保健、疾病管理和患者教育。
在基线期、“低剂量”期和“高剂量”干预后期,(a)达到美国糖尿病协会(ADA)血压控制指南(从26.9%升至33.1%再升至43.9%)、糖化血红蛋白(从48.5%升至57.5%再升至66.8%)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(从33.1%升至44.4%再升至56.6%)的患者比例显著更高;(b)接受推荐的预防性眼部(从26.2%升至36.4%再升至58%)、足部(从23.4%升至40.3%再升至66.9%)和肾脏(从38.5%升至53.9%再升至71%)检查或筛查的患者比例显著更高。
实施功能齐全的专门电子健康记录并结合量身定制的办公室工作流程改变,与初级保健提供者及其糖尿病患者对ADA指南(包括危险因素控制)的依从性增加相关。纳入先前确定的“关键成功因素”以及采用两阶段方法可能促成了该项目的成功。