• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Beyond health information technology: critical factors necessary for effective diabetes disease management.超越健康信息技术:有效糖尿病疾病管理所需的关键因素。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May 1;3(3):452-60. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300308.
2
Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study.将在线糖尿病预防项目的数据整合到电子健康记录和临床工作流程中的设计阶段可用性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 11;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0328-x.
3
Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care.基层医疗机构中电子健康记录的使用情况与糖尿病护理质量。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):221-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1370.
4
Implications of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Guidelines on Statin Underutilization for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus Among Several US Networks of Community Health Centers.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇指南对几种美国社区卫生中心网络中糖尿病患者心血管疾病预防中他汀类药物未充分利用的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 3;6(7):e005627. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005627.
5
Modest Associations Between Electronic Health Record Use and Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality of Care and Outcomes: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.电子健康记录的使用与急性心肌梗死医疗质量及预后之间的适度关联:来自国家心血管数据登记处的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):576-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001837. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
A Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Primary Care Provider Adherence to Chronic Opioid Therapy Guidelines and Reduce Opioid Misuse: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.一项多组分干预措施,旨在提高初级保健提供者对慢性阿片类药物治疗指南的依从性并减少阿片类药物滥用:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jan;60:101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.信息系统支持作为慢性病管理的关键成功因素:必要但不充分。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
8
Measuring and improving preventive care for patients with diabetes in primary health centers.在基层医疗中心测量并改善糖尿病患者的预防保健服务。
Am J Med Qual. 2002 Sep-Oct;17(5):179-84. doi: 10.1177/106286060201700504.
9
Physician process and patient outcome measures for diabetes care: relationships to organizational characteristics.糖尿病护理的医生诊疗过程与患者预后指标:与组织特征的关系
Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):840-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135809.92048.d9.
10
Association of Medical Scribes in Primary Care With Physician Workflow and Patient Experience.初级保健中医师助手与医师工作流程和患者体验的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1467-1472. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3956.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review: Matrix Metallopeptidase-9 Nanoparticles Targeted for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.综述:靶向治疗糖尿病足溃疡的基质金属蛋白酶-9纳米颗粒
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;14:3321-3329. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S343085. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of Two Electronic Systems for Obtaining Diabetes Care Indicators in Clinical Practice.两种用于在临床实践中获取糖尿病护理指标的电子系统的比较。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Apr;39(2):167-172. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0069.
3
Development of a Web-Based Registry to Support Diabetes Care in Free Medical Clinics.开发基于网络的登记系统以支持免费医疗诊所的糖尿病护理。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Jan 1;14(Winter):1a. eCollection 2017 Winter.
4
The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review.干预措施对糖尿病患者预约及临床结局的影响:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 2;15:355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0938-5.
5
Structuring clinical workflows for diabetes care: an overview of the OntoHealth approach.构建糖尿病护理临床工作流程:OntoHealth 方法概述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 28;5(2):512-26. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-04-RA-0039. eCollection 2014.
6
Rational use of electronic health records for diabetes population management.合理利用电子健康记录进行糖尿病群体管理。
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Apr;14(4):479. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0479-z.
7
Development of a workflow integration survey (WIS) for implementing computerized clinical decision support.用于实施计算机化临床决策支持的工作流程集成调查(WIS)的开发。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:427-34. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
8
Review of electronic decision-support tools for diabetes care: a viable option for low- and middle-income countries?糖尿病护理电子决策支持工具综述:低收入和中等收入国家的可行选择?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):553-70. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500310.
9
Building a diabetes screening population data repository using electronic medical records.利用电子病历建立糖尿病筛查人群数据储存库。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):514-22. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500306.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病的诊断与分类
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S062.
2
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2009》
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013.
3
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.2007年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017.
4
Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults?美国成年人的血糖控制情况正在改善吗?
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31(1):81-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1572. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
5
Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices.电子病历与糖尿病医疗质量:来自家庭医疗实践样本的结果
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):209-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.696.
6
Improving outcomes for high-risk diabetics using information systems.利用信息系统改善高危糖尿病患者的治疗效果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):245-51. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060185.
7
Measuring progress toward achieving hemoglobin A1c goals in diabetes care: pass/fail or partial credit.衡量糖尿病护理中实现糖化血红蛋白目标的进展:及格/不及格还是部分得分。
JAMA. 2007 Feb 7;297(5):520-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.5.520.
8
Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration.推进糖尿病的循证护理:退伍军人健康管理局的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w156-68. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w156. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
9
Impact of recent increase in incidence on future diabetes burden: U.S., 2005-2050.近期发病率上升对未来糖尿病负担的影响:美国,2005 - 2050年
Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2114-6. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1136.
10
Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.信息系统支持作为慢性病管理的关键成功因素:必要但不充分。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

超越健康信息技术:有效糖尿病疾病管理所需的关键因素。

Beyond health information technology: critical factors necessary for effective diabetes disease management.

作者信息

Ciemins Elizabeth L, Coon Patricia J, Fowles Jinnet Briggs, Min Sung-joon

机构信息

Center for Clinical Translational Research, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT 59107-7000, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May 1;3(3):452-60. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300308.

DOI:10.1177/193229680900300308
PMID:20144282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health records (EHRs) have been implemented throughout the United States with varying degrees of success. Past EHR implementation experiences can inform health systems planning to initiate new or expand existing EHR systems. Key "critical success factors," e.g., use of disease registries, workflow integration, and real-time clinical guideline support, have been identified but not fully tested in practice.

METHODS

A pre/postintervention cohort analysis was conducted on 495 adult patients selected randomly from a diabetes registry and followed for 6 years. Two intervention phases were evaluated: a "low-dose" period targeting primary care provider (PCP) and patient education followed by a "high-dose" EHR diabetes management implementation period, including a diabetes disease registry and office workflow changes, e.g., diabetes patient preidentification to facilitate real-time diabetes preventive care, disease management, and patient education.

RESULTS

Across baseline, "low-dose," and "high-dose" postintervention periods, a significantly greater proportion of patients (a) achieved American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for control of blood pressure (26.9 to 33.1 to 43.9%), glycosylated hemoglobin (48.5 to 57.5 to 66.8%), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (33.1 to 44.4 to 56.6%) and (b) received recommended preventive eye (26.2 to 36.4 to 58%), foot (23.4 to 40.3 to 66.9%), and renal (38.5 to 53.9 to 71%) examinations or screens.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a fully functional, specialized EHR combined with tailored office workflow process changes was associated with increased adherence to ADA guidelines, including risk factor control, by PCPs and their patients with diabetes. Incorporation of previously identified "critical success factors" potentially contributed to the success of the program, as did use of a two-phase approach.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录(EHRs)已在美国各地实施,成效各异。过去电子健康记录的实施经验可为卫生系统规划启动新的或扩展现有的电子健康记录系统提供参考。关键的“关键成功因素”,如疾病登记处的使用、工作流程整合和实时临床指南支持,已被确定,但在实践中尚未得到充分检验。

方法

对从糖尿病登记处随机选取的495名成年患者进行干预前/后队列分析,并随访6年。评估了两个干预阶段:一个针对初级保健提供者(PCP)和患者教育的“低剂量”期,随后是一个“高剂量”电子健康记录糖尿病管理实施期,包括糖尿病疾病登记处和办公室工作流程的改变,如糖尿病患者预识别,以促进实时糖尿病预防保健、疾病管理和患者教育。

结果

在基线期、“低剂量”期和“高剂量”干预后期,(a)达到美国糖尿病协会(ADA)血压控制指南(从26.9%升至33.1%再升至43.9%)、糖化血红蛋白(从48.5%升至57.5%再升至66.8%)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(从33.1%升至44.4%再升至56.6%)的患者比例显著更高;(b)接受推荐的预防性眼部(从26.2%升至36.4%再升至58%)、足部(从23.4%升至40.3%再升至66.9%)和肾脏(从38.5%升至53.9%再升至71%)检查或筛查的患者比例显著更高。

结论

实施功能齐全的专门电子健康记录并结合量身定制的办公室工作流程改变,与初级保健提供者及其糖尿病患者对ADA指南(包括危险因素控制)的依从性增加相关。纳入先前确定的“关键成功因素”以及采用两阶段方法可能促成了该项目的成功。