• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病护理的医生诊疗过程与患者预后指标:与组织特征的关系

Physician process and patient outcome measures for diabetes care: relationships to organizational characteristics.

作者信息

Ward Marcia M, Yankey Jon W, Vaughn Thomas E, BootsMiller Bonnie J, Flach Stephen D, Welke Karl F, Pendergast Jane F, Perlin Jonathan, Doebbeling Bradley N

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1008, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):840-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135809.92048.d9.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000135809.92048.d9
PMID:15319609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal diabetes management relies on providers adhering to evidence-based practice guidelines in the processes of care delivery and patients adhering to self-management recommendations to maximize patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

To explore: (1) the degree to which providers adhere to the guidelines; (2) the extent of glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control in patients with diabetes; and (3) the roles of organizational and patient population characteristics in affecting both provider adherence and patient outcome measures for diabetes.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis of provider adherence and patient outcome measures from chart reviews, along with surveys of facility quality managers.

SAMPLE

We sampled 109 Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs).

RESULTS

Analyses indicated that provider adherence to diabetes guidelines (ie, hemoglobin A1c, foot, eye, renal, and lipid screens) and patient outcome measures (ie, glycemic, lipid, and hypertension control plus nonsmoking status) are comparable or better in VAMCs than reported elsewhere. VAMCs with higher levels of provider adherence to diabetes guidelines had distinguishing organizational characteristics, including more frequent feedback on diabetes quality of care, designation of a guideline champion, timely implementation of quality-of-care changes, and greater acceptance of guideline applicability. VAMCs with better patient outcome measures for diabetes had more effective communication between physicians and nurses, used educational programs and Grand Rounds presentations to implement the diabetes guidelines, and had an overall patient population that was older and with a smaller percentage of black patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare organizations can adopt many of the identified organizational characteristics to enhance the delivery of care in their settings.

摘要

背景

最佳糖尿病管理依赖于医疗服务提供者在护理过程中遵循循证实践指南,以及患者遵循自我管理建议,以实现患者预后最大化。

目的

探讨:(1)医疗服务提供者遵循指南的程度;(2)糖尿病患者的血糖、血脂和血压控制程度;(3)组织和患者群体特征在影响医疗服务提供者对糖尿病的遵循情况及患者预后指标方面的作用。

设计

对图表审查中的医疗服务提供者遵循情况和患者预后指标进行二次数据分析,并对机构质量管理人员进行调查。

样本

我们抽取了109家退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)。

结果

分析表明,退伍军人事务医疗中心的医疗服务提供者对糖尿病指南(即糖化血红蛋白、足部、眼部、肾脏和血脂筛查)的遵循情况以及患者预后指标(即血糖、血脂和高血压控制以及吸烟状况)与其他地方报告的情况相当或更好。医疗服务提供者对糖尿病指南遵循程度较高的退伍军人事务医疗中心具有显著的组织特征,包括更频繁的糖尿病护理质量反馈、指定指南倡导者、及时实施护理质量改进措施以及对指南适用性的更高接受度。糖尿病患者预后指标较好的退伍军人事务医疗中心,医生和护士之间的沟通更有效,通过教育项目和全院大查房报告来实施糖尿病指南,并且总体患者群体年龄较大,黑人患者比例较小。

结论

医疗保健组织可以采用许多已确定的组织特征来加强其机构内的护理服务。

相似文献

1
Physician process and patient outcome measures for diabetes care: relationships to organizational characteristics.糖尿病护理的医生诊疗过程与患者预后指标:与组织特征的关系
Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):840-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135809.92048.d9.
2
Facility-level factors influencing chronic heart failure care process performance in a national integrated health delivery system.在一个全国性综合医疗服务体系中,影响慢性心力衰竭护理流程绩效的机构层面因素。
Med Care. 2007 Jan;45(1):28-45. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000244531.69528.ee.
3
Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case-mix (bias) and physician-level clustering on quality assessment results.不同医生群体提供的医疗服务剖析:患者病例组合(偏差)和医生层面聚类对质量评估结果的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):111-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00008.
4
What factors influence provider knowledge of a congestive heart failure guideline in a national health care system?在国家医疗保健系统中,哪些因素会影响医疗服务提供者对充血性心力衰竭指南的了解?
Am J Med Qual. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):122-7. doi: 10.1177/106286060301800306.
5
Diabetes care practices in primary care: results from two samples and three measurement sets.
Diabetes Educ. 1999 Sep-Oct;25(5):755-63. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500508.
6
Assessment and utilization of rapid virologic response in US veterans with chronic hepatitis C: evaluating provider adherence to practice guidelines.美国慢性丙型肝炎退伍军人中快速病毒学应答的评估和利用:评估提供者对实践指南的遵循情况。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;47(3):264-70. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31827035cf.
7
Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.我们应该对谁进行剖析?审视初级保健提供者、提供者群体和医疗保健机构之间糖尿病护理实践的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102.
8
Canadian Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes Toward Understanding Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Screening.加拿大初级保健医生对理解糖尿病筛查临床实践指南的态度。
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Dec;40(6):580-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.用于评估慢性病护理成本和质量的个体医生“成绩单”的不可靠性。
JAMA. 1999 Jun 9;281(22):2098-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2098.
10
Assessing doctors' compliance with guidelines on diabetes management.评估医生对糖尿病管理指南的遵循情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(2-3):267-86. doi: 10.1108/09526860610661482.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of champions in implementing innovations in health care: a systematic review.倡导者在医疗保健领域实施创新中的有效性:一项系统综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 22;3(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00315-0.
2
The sweeter side of retina.视网膜更美妙的一面。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;62(8):839-40. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.141032.
3
Structuring clinical workflows for diabetes care: an overview of the OntoHealth approach.构建糖尿病护理临床工作流程:OntoHealth 方法概述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 28;5(2):512-26. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-04-RA-0039. eCollection 2014.
4
Effective population management practices in diabetes care - an observational study.糖尿病护理中的有效人群管理实践——一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 21;10:277. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-277.
5
The effect of provider- and workflow-focused strategies for guideline implementation on provider acceptance.以提供者和工作流程为重点的指南实施策略对提供者接受度的影响。
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 29;4:71. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-71.
6
Assessing diabetes practices in clinical settings: precursor to building community partnerships around disease management.评估临床环境中的糖尿病诊疗实践:围绕疾病管理建立社区伙伴关系的前奏。
J Community Health. 2009 Dec;34(6):493-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9179-z.
7
Effect of a managed care disease management program on diabetes care.管理式医疗疾病管理方案对糖尿病治疗的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Sep;15(9):575-80.
8
A cost effectiveness study of integrated care in health services delivery: a diabetes program in Australia.卫生服务提供中综合护理的成本效益研究:澳大利亚的一个糖尿病项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 6;8:205. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-205.
9
Informatics implementation in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) healthcare system to improve quality of care.退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗系统中为提高医疗质量而进行的信息学实施。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:204-8.
10
Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect.为研究招募医疗团队:关系、声誉、要求、回报、互惠、解决方案和尊重。
Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 26;1:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-25.