Pavlova I V
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2010 Mar;40(3):305-14. doi: 10.1007/s11055-010-9257-9. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
Cross-correlation histograms were used to compare the interaction of close-lying cells in the hippocampus (field CA1) and the parietal-temporal areas of the neocortex in active and passive rabbits during exposure to emotionally significant stimuli. Interaction of hippocampal neurons depended on the type of the behavioral response to the stimulus. The greatest changes from baseline were seen in active rabbits in orientational-investigative and active defensive reactions, while the greatest changes in passive animals were in freezing. In all states, cases of common inputs to hippocampal neurons were found more frequently in passive rabbits and excitatory links between neurons with short delays (up to 40 msec) were more frequent in active rabbits. Interaction of neocortical neurons, in contrast with hippocampal neurons, was less dependent on the type of behavioral response to the stimulus and the animal's behavioral strategy. These results provide evidence of individual-typological features in information processing in hippocampal field CA1 in active and passive animals in emotionally negative situations.
在暴露于具有情感意义的刺激过程中,使用互相关直方图来比较活跃和被动兔子海马体(CA1区)以及新皮质顶颞区中相邻细胞的相互作用。海马神经元的相互作用取决于对刺激的行为反应类型。与基线相比,活跃兔子在定向探究和主动防御反应中变化最大,而被动动物变化最大的是僵住不动。在所有状态下,被动兔子中向海马神经元的共同输入情况更常见,而活跃兔子中神经元之间具有短延迟(长达40毫秒)的兴奋性连接更频繁。与海马神经元相比,新皮质神经元的相互作用对刺激的行为反应类型和动物的行为策略依赖性较小。这些结果为情绪消极情况下活跃和被动动物海马CA1区信息处理中的个体类型特征提供了证据。