Suppr超能文献

利用 SDS-PAGE、RP-HPLC、HPCE 和 MALDI-TOF-MS 对小麦高分子量谷蛋白亚基进行表征和比较分析。

Characterization and comparative analysis of wheat high molecular weight glutenin subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Genetics and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Capital Normal University, 100048 Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Mar 10;58(5):2777-86. doi: 10.1021/jf903363z.

Abstract

High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.

摘要

利用十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)、反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)、高效毛细管电泳(HPCE)和基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF-MS)等一系列分离方法,对 60 份种质资源(包括 30 个普通小麦品种和 30 个相关物种)的高分子量谷蛋白亚基(HMW-GS)进行了分离和鉴定。比较分析表明,每种方法都有其自身的优点和缺点。SDS-PAGE 的主要缺点是分辨率低,导致其对高分子质量的估计过高,对 HMW-GS 的鉴定不正确。然而,它具有技术简单、设备要求低的优点;因此,它适用于大规模高通量的 HMW-GS 筛选,特别是在育种材料中谷蛋白组成清晰的情况下。MALDI-TOF-MS 在评估的四种方法中明显表现出许多技术优势,包括高通量、高分辨率和准确性;然而,它与设备成本高有关,因此许多育种公司无法获得这项技术。RP-HPLC 和 HPCE 被发现介于 SDS-PAGE 和 MALDI-TOF-MS 之间。RP-HPLC 和 HPCE 均表现出比 SDS-PAGE 更高的分辨率和重现性,但检测能力低于 MALDI-TOF-MS。结果表明,MALDI-TOF-MS 适用于常规育种系筛选和新基因型鉴定中的 HMW-GS 分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验