Suppr超能文献

民主化经济学:多元化是可持续发展的道路。

Democratizing economics: pluralism as a path toward sustainability.

机构信息

Ecological Economics, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:179-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05283.x.

Abstract

Climate scientists point to a number of unsustainable trends concerning the environment and natural resources. There is also ongoing concern about poverty reduction, labor rights, and other social aspects of sustainable development. Growing numbers argue that change is required, but still at issue is the extent of change and how to facilitate it. In this paper, the focus is on the dominant interpretive schema of influential actors with respect to ideas about science in society, paradigms in economics, and ideological orientations. The authors argue that the monopolistic position of neoclassical economics at university departments of economics in different parts of the world, and the spread of its associated technocratic logic within broader policy arenas, should be abandoned in favor of a more ideologically open attitude that facilitates discussion and debate within academia, public policy, and in civil society more generally. In a sense, economics requires "democratization" with implications for approaches to sustainability monitoring, accounting, and the assessment of projects and policies. The paper provides suggestions for developing sustainability assessment technologies and practices that take pluralism seriously.

摘要

气候科学家指出了许多与环境和自然资源有关的不可持续趋势。人们还持续关注减贫、劳工权利和可持续发展的其他社会方面。越来越多的人认为需要进行变革,但仍存在争议的是变革的程度以及如何促进变革。本文的重点是关于有影响力的行为者在社会科学观念、经济学范式和意识形态取向方面的主导解释模式。作者认为,新古典经济学在世界不同地区的经济学系的垄断地位,以及其相关技术官僚逻辑在更广泛的政策领域的传播,应该被放弃,而代之以一种更加意识形态开放的态度,这种态度有利于在学术界、公共政策和更广泛的公民社会中促进讨论和辩论。从某种意义上说,经济学需要“民主化”,这对可持续性监测、会计以及项目和政策的评估方法有影响。本文为制定可持续性评估技术和实践提供了建议,这些技术和实践认真对待多元化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验