Kallert Thomas W, Nitsche Ines
Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Parkkrankenhaus Leipzig-Südost GmbH, Leipzig.
Neuropsychiatr. 2010;24(1):42-55.
Within the last few years, a small number of German cost analyses of patients treated in community mental health care settings was presented. None of these studies, however, examined direct health care costs of the patients' close reference persons focusing on costs associated with providing informal care. Therefore, our study aimed to analyse health-related direct costs of severely ill patients suffering from affective or schizophrenic disorders, and of their informal carers during community mental health care; further, we examined if these costs differed between the diagnostic groups.
69 patients currently treated by community mental health services of the Dresden region and their closest reference person providing informal care were assessed twice within an interval of 3 months by use of the CSSRI- D. Thus, direct health care costs of patients and their informal carers covering a 6-months-period could be calculated.
25.35% and 38.24%, respectively, of the closest reference persons' direct health care costs were caused by the situation of acting as informal carer. This was 9.12% and 22.74%, respectively, of the patients' direct health care costs assessed at the same time-points. Patients' costs did not differ between the diagnostic categories, but were influenced by the current severity of psychopathological symptoms. Reference persons' costs were influenced by the severity of the patient's psychopathological symptoms, but also by the social control behaviour of the reference persons themselves as well as by their sense of coherence.
While a replication of our findings is urgently needed, they point at the economic significance of direct health-related costs caused by acting as informal carers. Further, therapeutic approaches adequate for minimizing these costs could be suggested, like emphasizing protective factors of mental well-being in psycho-educational programmes for relatives.
在过去几年里,有少量关于在社区精神卫生保健机构接受治疗的患者的德国成本分析报告。然而,这些研究均未考察患者亲密参照者的直接医疗保健成本,尤其是与提供非正式护理相关的成本。因此,我们的研究旨在分析患有情感障碍或精神分裂症的重症患者及其非正式护理者在社区精神卫生保健期间与健康相关的直接成本;此外,我们还考察了这些成本在不同诊断组之间是否存在差异。
德累斯顿地区社区精神卫生服务机构目前正在治疗的69名患者及其提供非正式护理的最亲密参照者,在3个月的间隔内使用CSSRI-D进行了两次评估。由此,可以计算出患者及其非正式护理者6个月期间的直接医疗保健成本。
最亲密参照者的直接医疗保健成本分别有25.35%和38.24%是由担任非正式护理者的情况所致。在同一时间点评估的患者直接医疗保健成本中,这一比例分别为9.12%和22.74%。患者的成本在不同诊断类别之间没有差异,但受当前精神病理症状严重程度的影响。参照者的成本受患者精神病理症状严重程度的影响,也受参照者自身的社会控制行为及其连贯感的影响。
虽然迫切需要对我们的研究结果进行重复验证,但这些结果表明了担任非正式护理者所导致的与健康相关的直接成本的经济意义。此外,可以提出适当的治疗方法以尽量减少这些成本,比如在为亲属开展的心理教育项目中强调心理健康的保护因素。