Simon Gregory E, Ludman Evette J, Bauer Mark S, Unützer Jürgen, Operskalski Belinda
Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98101, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):500-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.500.
Despite the availability of efficacious treatments, the long-term course of bipolar disorder is often unfavorable.
To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention program to improve the quality of care and long-term outcomes for persons with bipolar disorder.
Randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment.
Mental health clinics of a group-model prepaid health plan.
Of 785 patients in treatment for bipolar disorder who were invited to participate, 509 attended an evaluation appointment, 450 were found eligible to participate, and 441 enrolled in the trial.
Participants were randomly assigned to a multicomponent intervention program or to continued care as usual. Three nurse care managers provided a 2-year systematic intervention program, including the following: a structured group psychoeducational program, monthly telephone monitoring of mood symptoms and medication adherence, feedback to treating mental health providers, facilitation of appropriate follow-up care, and as-needed outreach and crisis intervention.
In-person blinded research interviews every 3 months assessed mood symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Examination. Health plan administrative records were used to assess the use and cost of mental health services.
Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that the intervention significantly reduced the mean level of mania symptoms (z = 2.09, P = .04) and the time with significant mania symptoms (19.2 vs 24.7 weeks; F(1) = 6.0, P = .01). There was no significant intervention effect on mean level of depressive symptoms (z = 0.19, P = .85) or time with significant depressive symptoms (47.6 vs 50.7 weeks; F(1) = 0.56, P = .45). Benefits of the intervention were found only in a subgroup of 343 persons with clinically significant mood symptoms at the baseline assessment. The incremental cost (adjusted) of the intervention was 1251 dollars (95% confidence interval, 55-2446 dollars), including approximately 800 dollars for the intervention program services and an approximate 500 dollars increase in the costs of other mental health services.
Population-based systematic care programs can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of mania in bipolar disorder, and cost increases are modest considering the clinical gains. The incorporation of more specific cognitive and behavioral content or more effective medication regimens may be necessary to significantly reduce the symptoms of depression.
尽管有有效的治疗方法,但双相情感障碍的长期病程往往不佳。
测试多成分干预项目对改善双相情感障碍患者护理质量和长期预后的有效性。
采用分配隐藏和盲法结局评估的随机对照试验。
一个团体模式预付健康计划的心理健康诊所。
在受邀参与的785名双相情感障碍治疗患者中,509人参加了评估预约,450人被认定符合参与条件,441人纳入试验。
参与者被随机分配到多成分干预项目或继续常规护理。三名护士护理经理提供为期两年的系统干预项目,包括:结构化团体心理教育项目、每月对情绪症状和药物依从性进行电话监测、向治疗心理健康服务提供者反馈、促进适当的后续护理以及必要时的外展和危机干预。
每3个月进行一次面对面盲法研究访谈,使用纵向间隔随访检查评估情绪症状。利用健康计划管理记录评估心理健康服务的使用情况和成本。
意向性分析表明,干预显著降低了躁狂症状的平均水平(z = 2.09,P = 0.04)以及出现显著躁狂症状的时间(19.2周对24.7周;F(1) = 6.0,P = 0.01)。对抑郁症状的平均水平(z = 0.19,P = 0.85)或出现显著抑郁症状的时间(47.6周对50.7周;F(1) = 0.56,P = 0.45)没有显著干预效果。干预的益处仅在基线评估时有临床显著情绪症状的343人亚组中发现。干预的增量成本(调整后)为1251美元(95%置信区间,55 - 2446美元),包括干预项目服务约800美元以及其他心理健康服务成本约增加500美元。
基于人群的系统护理项目可显著降低双相情感障碍中躁狂的频率和严重程度,考虑到临床获益,成本增加幅度不大。可能需要纳入更具体的认知和行为内容或更有效的药物治疗方案,以显著减轻抑郁症状。