Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Implant Dent. 2010 Feb;19(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181bb9033.
The debate between screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses has long been discussed but the best type of implant prosthesis remains controversial among practitioners. An understanding of their properties will help the clinician in selecting the ideal prosthesis for each clinical case while promoting final esthetic outcomes. With the evolving technology and knowledge, an update of the current trends is necessary. This article provides an overview of the different characteristics of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations, and how they may influence the esthetics, retrievability, retention, passivity, occlusion, accessibility, cost, and provisional restorations. Problems and complications frequently encountered are discussed and treatment solutions are proposed.
螺丝钉固位与黏固剂固位种植体修复体的争论由来已久，但哪种种植体修复体类型最好，临床医生仍存在争议。了解它们的特性将有助于临床医生在选择每个临床病例的理想修复体的同时，促进最终的美学效果。随着技术和知识的不断发展，有必要更新当前的趋势。本文概述了螺丝钉固位和黏固剂固位种植体修复体的不同特点，以及它们如何影响美学、可摘性、保留、被动性、咬合、可及性、成本和临时修复体。讨论了经常遇到的问题和并发症，并提出了治疗方案。
