Departments of Medicine.
Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4):802-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Certain patient groups are predicted to derive significant survival benefit from transplantation with expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. An algorithm published in 2005 by Merion and colleagues characterizes this group: older adults, diabetics and registrants at centers with long waiting times. Our goal was to evaluate ECD listing practice patterns in the United States in terms of these characteristics. We reviewed 142 907 first-time deceased donor kidney registrants reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2003 and 2008. Of registrants predicted to benefit from ECD transplantation according to the Merion algorithm ('ECD-benefit'), 49.8% were listed for ECD offers ('ECD-willing'), with proportions ranging from 0% to 100% by transplant center. In contrast, 67.6% of adults over the age of 65 years were ECD-willing, also ranging from 0% to 100% by center. In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor center waiting time was significantly associated with ECD-willingness in any subgroup. From the time of initial registration, irrespective of eventual transplantation, ECD-willingness was associated with a significant adjusted survival advantage in the ECD-benefit group (HR for death 0.88, p < 0.001) and in older adults (HR 0.89, p < 0.001), but an increased mortality in non-ECD-benefit registrants (HR 1.11, p < 0.001). In conclusion, ECD listing practices are widely varied and not consistent with published recommendations, a pattern that may disenfranchise certain transplant registrants.
某些患者群体预计从扩大标准供体(ECD)肾脏移植中获得显著的生存获益。2005 年,Merion 及其同事发表的一项算法对该群体进行了特征描述:老年人、糖尿病患者和在等待时间较长的中心登记的患者。我们的目标是根据这些特征评估美国 ECD 登记实践模式。我们回顾了 2003 年至 2008 年期间向美国器官共享网络(UNOS)报告的 142907 名首次死亡供体肾脏登记者。根据 Merion 算法预测,有 49.8%的 ECD 获益登记者(ECD 意愿者)被列入 ECD 供体名单,每个移植中心的比例范围从 0%到 100%。相比之下,67.6%的 65 岁以上成年人也愿意接受 ECD 供体,各中心的比例也在 0%到 100%之间。在多变量模型中,糖尿病或中心等待时间与任何亚组的 ECD 意愿都没有显著关联。从最初登记开始,无论最终是否进行移植,在 ECD 获益组(死亡风险比[HR]为 0.88,p<0.001)和老年人中(HR 为 0.89,p<0.001),ECD 意愿者的调整后生存率都显著提高,但在非 ECD 获益登记者中死亡率增加(HR 为 1.11,p<0.001)。总之,ECD 登记实践差异很大,与已发表的建议不一致,这种模式可能使某些移植登记者失去资格。