• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit.列出适合老年和预计获益患者的扩展标准供者肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4):802-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
2
A Prognostic Index for Deceased Donor Kidneys and Criteria for Identifying Suitable Candidates for Kidney Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donors with Prolonged Waiting Times.deceased供肾的预后指数及识别等待时间延长的扩大标准供体肾移植合适受者的标准
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;11(1):143-153. doi: 10.1159/000544792. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Age and the associations of living donor and expanded criteria donor kidneys with kidney transplant outcomes.年龄与活体供肾和扩大标准供肾与肾移植结局的关系。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jun;59(6):841-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
4
Mortality experience in recipients undergoing repeat transplantation with expanded criteria donor and non-ECD deceased-donor kidneys.接受扩大标准供体和非扩大标准供体死亡供肾再次移植受者的死亡情况
Am J Transplant. 2007 May;7(5):1140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01742.x. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.已故供体特征与肾移植的生存获益
JAMA. 2005 Dec 7;294(21):2726-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.21.2726.
6
Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database.70岁及以上已故肾脏供体的患者和移植物结局:器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Transplantation. 2008 Jun 15;85(11):1573-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817059a1.
7
Impact of Korea Network for Organ Sharing Expanded Donor Criteria on Delayed Graft Fuction in Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.韩国器官共享网络扩大供体标准对肾移植延迟移植功能的影响:单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2363-2367. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.04.046. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
8
Expanded criteria donor kidneys for retransplantation United Network for Organ Sharing update: proceed with caution.器官共享联合网络关于再次移植的扩大标准供肾更新:谨慎行事。
Transpl Int. 2015 Aug;28(8):990-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12584. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant.利用扩大标准死亡器官供体增加肾移植,其结果与标准标准供体移植相当。
Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):688-95; discussion 695-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000124296.46712.67.
10
Outcomes of dual adult kidney transplants in the United States: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.美国成人双肾移植的结果:器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Transplantation. 2008 Jan 15;85(1):62-8. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000296855.44445.af.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Caregiver Perceptions on the Allocation Process and Waitlist, and Accepting a Less-Than-Ideal Kidney: A Canadian Survey.患者及护理人员对分配过程、候补名单以及接受不理想肾脏的看法:一项加拿大调查
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Apr 3;12:20543581251324608. doi: 10.1177/20543581251324608. eCollection 2025.
2
Educational Animations to Inform Transplant Candidates About Deceased Donor Kidney Options: An Efficacy Randomized Trial.用于向移植候选人介绍已故捐赠者肾脏选项的教育动画:一项疗效随机试验。
Transplant Direct. 2020 Jun 23;6(7):e575. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001026. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Factors Considered by Nephrologists in Excluding Patients from Kidney Transplant Referral.肾脏病学家在排除患者进行肾移植转诊时考虑的因素。
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2019;10(3):101-107.
4
Kidney Transplant Evaluation: Inferences from Qualitative Interviews with African American Patients and their Providers.肾移植评估:对非裔美国患者及其医疗服务提供者进行定性访谈得出的推论。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Oct;6(5):917-925. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00592-x. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
Expanding deceased donor kidney transplantation: medical risk, infectious risk, hepatitis C virus, and HIV.扩大已故供体肾移植:医学风险、感染风险、丙型肝炎病毒和 HIV。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018 Nov;27(6):445-453. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000456.
6
Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.构建终末期肾病医疗服务的理想质量指标
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):1351-1356. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01020117. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.扩大使用老年供体肾脏的策略。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):727-745. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001635.
8
Survival Benefit in Older Patients Associated With Earlier Transplant With High KDPI Kidneys.高KDPI肾脏早期移植对老年患者的生存益处。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):867-872. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001405.
9
A Lifetime of Allograft Function with Kidneys from Older Donors.老年供者肾脏的同种异体移植功能的长期维持。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2483-93. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014080771. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the allocation of expanded criteria donor kidneys.扩大标准供体肾脏分配中的种族和社会经济差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Dec;8(12):2158-64. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01430213. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating options for utility-based kidney allocation.评估基于效用的肾脏分配方案。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Jul;9(7):1513-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02667.x. Epub 2009 May 20.
2
Age and comorbidities are effect modifiers of gender disparities in renal transplantation.年龄和合并症是肾移植中性别差异的效应修饰因素。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):621-8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008060591. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
3
A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.对扩大标准供体肾移植的系统评价。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Sep;52(3):553-86. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.005.
4
Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年美国的器官捐赠与利用情况
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):922-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02171.x.
5
Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion.扩大标准供肾丢弃的决定因素:活检和机器灌注的影响
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4):783-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02157.x. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
6
Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on candidates for and recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys.扩大标准供体分配系统对扩大标准供体肾脏候选者及受者的影响。
Transplantation. 2007 Nov 15;84(9):1138-44. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000287118.76725.c1.
7
Prospective age-matching in elderly kidney transplant recipients--a 5-year analysis of the Eurotransplant Senior Program.老年肾移植受者的前瞻性年龄匹配——欧洲移植高级项目的5年分析
Am J Transplant. 2008 Jan;8(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02014.x. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
8
Which renal transplant candidates should accept marginal kidneys in exchange for a shorter waiting time on dialysis?哪些肾移植候选人应该接受边缘供肾以换取更短的透析等待时间?
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 May;1(3):532-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01130905. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
9
Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005.1996 - 2005年美国的肾脏和胰腺移植
Am J Transplant. 2007;7(5 Pt 2):1359-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01781.x.
10
Allocating deceased donor kidneys: maximizing years of life.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Feb;49(2):180-2. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.046.

列出适合老年和预计获益患者的扩展标准供者肾脏。

Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine.

Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4):802-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x
PMID:20148808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3146063/
Abstract

Certain patient groups are predicted to derive significant survival benefit from transplantation with expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. An algorithm published in 2005 by Merion and colleagues characterizes this group: older adults, diabetics and registrants at centers with long waiting times. Our goal was to evaluate ECD listing practice patterns in the United States in terms of these characteristics. We reviewed 142 907 first-time deceased donor kidney registrants reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2003 and 2008. Of registrants predicted to benefit from ECD transplantation according to the Merion algorithm ('ECD-benefit'), 49.8% were listed for ECD offers ('ECD-willing'), with proportions ranging from 0% to 100% by transplant center. In contrast, 67.6% of adults over the age of 65 years were ECD-willing, also ranging from 0% to 100% by center. In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor center waiting time was significantly associated with ECD-willingness in any subgroup. From the time of initial registration, irrespective of eventual transplantation, ECD-willingness was associated with a significant adjusted survival advantage in the ECD-benefit group (HR for death 0.88, p < 0.001) and in older adults (HR 0.89, p < 0.001), but an increased mortality in non-ECD-benefit registrants (HR 1.11, p < 0.001). In conclusion, ECD listing practices are widely varied and not consistent with published recommendations, a pattern that may disenfranchise certain transplant registrants.

摘要

某些患者群体预计从扩大标准供体(ECD)肾脏移植中获得显著的生存获益。2005 年,Merion 及其同事发表的一项算法对该群体进行了特征描述:老年人、糖尿病患者和在等待时间较长的中心登记的患者。我们的目标是根据这些特征评估美国 ECD 登记实践模式。我们回顾了 2003 年至 2008 年期间向美国器官共享网络(UNOS)报告的 142907 名首次死亡供体肾脏登记者。根据 Merion 算法预测,有 49.8%的 ECD 获益登记者(ECD 意愿者)被列入 ECD 供体名单,每个移植中心的比例范围从 0%到 100%。相比之下,67.6%的 65 岁以上成年人也愿意接受 ECD 供体,各中心的比例也在 0%到 100%之间。在多变量模型中,糖尿病或中心等待时间与任何亚组的 ECD 意愿都没有显著关联。从最初登记开始,无论最终是否进行移植,在 ECD 获益组(死亡风险比[HR]为 0.88,p<0.001)和老年人中(HR 为 0.89,p<0.001),ECD 意愿者的调整后生存率都显著提高,但在非 ECD 获益登记者中死亡率增加(HR 为 1.11,p<0.001)。总之,ECD 登记实践差异很大,与已发表的建议不一致,这种模式可能使某些移植登记者失去资格。