Suppr超能文献

列出适合老年和预计获益患者的扩展标准供者肾脏。

Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine.

Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4):802-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Abstract

Certain patient groups are predicted to derive significant survival benefit from transplantation with expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. An algorithm published in 2005 by Merion and colleagues characterizes this group: older adults, diabetics and registrants at centers with long waiting times. Our goal was to evaluate ECD listing practice patterns in the United States in terms of these characteristics. We reviewed 142 907 first-time deceased donor kidney registrants reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2003 and 2008. Of registrants predicted to benefit from ECD transplantation according to the Merion algorithm ('ECD-benefit'), 49.8% were listed for ECD offers ('ECD-willing'), with proportions ranging from 0% to 100% by transplant center. In contrast, 67.6% of adults over the age of 65 years were ECD-willing, also ranging from 0% to 100% by center. In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor center waiting time was significantly associated with ECD-willingness in any subgroup. From the time of initial registration, irrespective of eventual transplantation, ECD-willingness was associated with a significant adjusted survival advantage in the ECD-benefit group (HR for death 0.88, p < 0.001) and in older adults (HR 0.89, p < 0.001), but an increased mortality in non-ECD-benefit registrants (HR 1.11, p < 0.001). In conclusion, ECD listing practices are widely varied and not consistent with published recommendations, a pattern that may disenfranchise certain transplant registrants.

摘要

某些患者群体预计从扩大标准供体(ECD)肾脏移植中获得显著的生存获益。2005 年,Merion 及其同事发表的一项算法对该群体进行了特征描述:老年人、糖尿病患者和在等待时间较长的中心登记的患者。我们的目标是根据这些特征评估美国 ECD 登记实践模式。我们回顾了 2003 年至 2008 年期间向美国器官共享网络(UNOS)报告的 142907 名首次死亡供体肾脏登记者。根据 Merion 算法预测,有 49.8%的 ECD 获益登记者(ECD 意愿者)被列入 ECD 供体名单,每个移植中心的比例范围从 0%到 100%。相比之下,67.6%的 65 岁以上成年人也愿意接受 ECD 供体,各中心的比例也在 0%到 100%之间。在多变量模型中,糖尿病或中心等待时间与任何亚组的 ECD 意愿都没有显著关联。从最初登记开始,无论最终是否进行移植,在 ECD 获益组(死亡风险比[HR]为 0.88,p<0.001)和老年人中(HR 为 0.89,p<0.001),ECD 意愿者的调整后生存率都显著提高,但在非 ECD 获益登记者中死亡率增加(HR 为 1.11,p<0.001)。总之,ECD 登记实践差异很大,与已发表的建议不一致,这种模式可能使某些移植登记者失去资格。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.构建终末期肾病医疗服务的理想质量指标
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):1351-1356. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01020117. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.扩大使用老年供体肾脏的策略。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):727-745. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001635.
9
A Lifetime of Allograft Function with Kidneys from Older Donors.老年供者肾脏的同种异体移植功能的长期维持。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2483-93. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014080771. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating options for utility-based kidney allocation.评估基于效用的肾脏分配方案。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Jul;9(7):1513-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02667.x. Epub 2009 May 20.
4
Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年美国的器官捐赠与利用情况
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):922-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02171.x.
9
Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005.1996 - 2005年美国的肾脏和胰腺移植
Am J Transplant. 2007;7(5 Pt 2):1359-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01781.x.
10
Allocating deceased donor kidneys: maximizing years of life.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Feb;49(2):180-2. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.046.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验