Center for Treatment Adherence, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Dec;11(8):563-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00645.x.
A major focus of pediatric multidisciplinary diabetes care is promoting glycemic control (A1c) while ensuring high quality of life (QOL). The current study investigated factors associated with A1c and QOL using a methodology that considered these variables as simultaneous outcomes.
A total of 261 adolescents (aged 13-18) with type 1 diabetes completed measures of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) frequency, diabetes-specific QOL, negative affect, and depression. Caregivers completed measures of demographic and disease characteristics, depression, and family conflict.
A1c was negatively correlated with QOL (r = -0.18 to -0.29, p < 0.01) across all subscales. Based on clinical A1c goals and median QOL scores, adolescents fell into four glycemic control-QOL groups. Multinomial logistic regression determined correlates of group membership utilizing adolescents with suboptimal glycemic control-low QOL as the referent group. Adolescents with optimal glycemic control-high QOL reported increased BGM frequency (OR = 1.87), less negative affect (OR = 1.32), and were more likely to use CSII (OR = 5.41). Adolescents with optimal A1c-low QOL reported greater BGM frequency (OR = 1.91) and shorter disease duration (OR = 1.09). Adolescents with suboptimal glycemic control-high QOL reported greater BGM frequency (OR = 1.41), fewer depressive symptoms (OR = 1.13), and less negative affect (OR = 1.31).
Results reveal disease, management, and psychosocial characteristics that differentiate glycemic control-QOL outcome groups and identify risk factors related to this relationship. Further appreciation of these characteristics may increase clinicians' understanding and attention to these important clinical outcomes and help tailor the most appropriate interventions (e.g., individual psychotherapy vs. family problem-solving interventions) to help adolescents achieve glycemic control without sacrificing QOL.
儿科多学科糖尿病护理的一个主要重点是在确保高质量生活(QOL)的同时促进血糖控制(A1c)。本研究使用一种同时考虑这些变量的方法,调查了与 A1c 和 QOL 相关的因素。
共有 261 名患有 1 型糖尿病的青少年(年龄 13-18 岁)完成了血糖监测(BGM)频率、糖尿病特定 QOL、负性情绪和抑郁的测量。照顾者完成了人口统计学和疾病特征、抑郁和家庭冲突的测量。
A1c 与所有子量表的 QOL 呈负相关(r = -0.18 至 -0.29,p < 0.01)。根据临床 A1c 目标和中位数 QOL 评分,青少年分为四个血糖控制-QOL 组。使用血糖控制不佳-QOL 较低的青少年作为参考组,使用多项逻辑回归确定了组内成员的相关性。血糖控制良好-QOL 较高的青少年报告了更高的 BGM 频率(OR = 1.87)、更少的负性情绪(OR = 1.32),并且更有可能使用 CSII(OR = 5.41)。血糖控制良好-QOL 较低的青少年报告了更高的 BGM 频率(OR = 1.91)和更短的疾病持续时间(OR = 1.09)。血糖控制不佳-QOL 较高的青少年报告了更高的 BGM 频率(OR = 1.41)、更少的抑郁症状(OR = 1.13)和更少的负性情绪(OR = 1.31)。
结果揭示了区分血糖控制-QOL 结果组的疾病、管理和心理社会特征,并确定了与这种关系相关的风险因素。进一步了解这些特征可能会增加临床医生对这些重要临床结果的理解和关注,并帮助量身定制最合适的干预措施(例如,个体心理治疗与家庭问题解决干预),帮助青少年在不牺牲 QOL 的情况下实现血糖控制。