Hannon Tamara S, Moore Courtney M, Cheng Erika R, Lynch Dustin O, Yazel-Smith Lisa G, Claxton Gina Em, Carroll Aaron E, Wiehe Sarah E
Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Children's Health Services Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
J Particip Med. 2018 May 10;10(2):e8. doi: 10.2196/jopm.9652.
Adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus have difficulty achieving optimal glycemic control, partly due to competing priorities that interfere with diabetes self-care. Often, significant diabetes-related family conflict occurs, and adolescents' thoughts and feelings about diabetes management may be disregarded. Patient-centered diabetes outcomes may be better when adolescents feel engaged in the decision-making process.
The objective of our study was to codesign a clinic intervention using shared decision making for addressing diabetes self-care with an adolescent patient and parent advisory board.
The patient and parent advisory board consisted of 6 adolescents (teens) between the ages 12 and 18 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents recruited through our institution's Pediatric Diabetes Program. Teens and parents provided informed consent and participated in 1 or both of 2 patient and parent advisory board sessions, lasting 3 to 4 hours each. Session 1 topics were (1) patient-centered outcomes related to quality of life, parent-teen shared diabetes management, and shared family experiences; and (2) implementation and acceptability of a patient-centered diabetes care plan intervention where shared decision making was used. We analyzed audio recordings, notes, and other materials to identify and extract ideas relevant to the development of a patient-centered diabetes management plan. These data were visually coded into similar themes. We used the information to develop a prototype for a diabetes management plan tool that we pilot tested during session 2.
Session 1 identified 6 principal patient-centered quality-of-life measurement domains: stress, fear and worry, mealtime struggles, assumptions and judgments, feeling abnormal, and conflict. We determined 2 objectives to be principally important for a diabetes management plan intervention: (1) focusing the intervention on diabetes distress and conflict resolution strategies, and (2) working toward a verbalized common goal. In session 2, we created the diabetes management plan tool according to these findings and will use it in a clinical trial with the aim of assisting with patient-centered goal setting.
Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus can be effectively engaged and involved in patient-centered research design. Teens with type 1 diabetes mellitus prioritize reducing family conflict and fitting into their social milieu over health outcomes at this time in their lives. It is important to acknowledge this when designing interventions to improve health outcomes in teens with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
1型糖尿病青少年患者难以实现最佳血糖控制,部分原因是相互竞争的事务干扰了糖尿病自我管理。通常,会出现严重的与糖尿病相关的家庭冲突,青少年对糖尿病管理的想法和感受可能被忽视。当青少年感到参与到决策过程中时,以患者为中心的糖尿病治疗效果可能会更好。
我们研究的目的是与青少年患者及家长咨询委员会共同设计一种临床干预措施,采用共同决策来解决糖尿病自我管理问题。
患者及家长咨询委员会由6名年龄在12至18岁之间的1型糖尿病青少年及其父母组成, 通过我们机构的儿科糖尿病项目招募而来。青少年和家长提供了知情同意书,并参加了2次患者及家长咨询委员会会议中的1次或2次,每次会议持续3至4小时。第一次会议的主题是:(1) 与生活质量、家长 - 青少年共同的糖尿病管理以及共同的家庭经历相关的以患者为中心的结果;(2) 使用共同决策的以患者为中心的糖尿病护理计划干预措施的实施和可接受性。我们分析了录音、笔记和其他材料,以识别和提取与制定以患者为中心的糖尿病管理计划相关的想法。这些数据被直观地编码为相似的主题。我们利用这些信息开发了一个糖尿病管理计划工具的原型,并在第二次会议期间进行了试点测试。
第一次会议确定了6个主要的以患者为中心的生活质量衡量领域:压力、恐惧和担忧、用餐困难、假设和判断、感觉异常以及冲突。我们确定了糖尿病管理计划干预措施的2个主要重要目标:(1) 将干预重点放在糖尿病困扰和冲突解决策略上,(2) 朝着明确表达的共同目标努力。在第二次会议中,我们根据这些发现创建了糖尿病管理计划工具,并将在一项临床试验中使用它,目的是协助进行以患者为中心的目标设定。
1型糖尿病患者可以有效地参与到以患者为中心的研究设计中。1型糖尿病青少年在他们生命中的这个阶段,将减少家庭冲突和融入社会环境置于健康结果之上。在设计改善1型糖尿病青少年健康结果的干预措施时,认识到这一点很重要。