Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Apr;79(4):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
To evaluate the functionality of drug safety alerting in hospital computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems by a newly developed comprehensive test.
Comparative evaluation of drug safety alerting quality in 6 different CPOEs used in Dutch hospitals, by means of 29 test items for sensitivity and 19 for specificity in offices of CPOE system vendors. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the complete test, and for the categories "within-order checks", "patient-specific checks", and "checks related to laboratory data and new patient conditions". Qualitative interviews with 16 hospital pharmacists evaluating missing functionality and corresponding pharmacy checks.
Sensitivity ranged from 0.38 to 0.79 and specificity from 0.11 to 0.84. The systems achieved the same ranking for sensitivity as for specificity. Within-order checks and patient-specific checks were present in all systems; alert generation or suppression due to laboratory data and new patient conditions was largely absent. Hospital pharmacists unanimously rated checks on contra-indications (absent in 2 CPOEs) and dose regimens less than once a day (absent in 4 CPOEs) as important. Pharmacists' opinions were more divergent for other test items. A variety of pharmacy checks were used, and clinical rules developed, to address missing functionality.
Our test revealed widely varying functionality and appeared to be highly discriminative. Basic clinical decision support was partly absent in two CPOEs. Hospital pharmacists did not rate all test items as important and tried to accommodate the lacking functionality by performing additional checks and developing clinical rules.
通过新开发的综合测试来评估医院计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统中的药物安全警报功能。
通过在 CPOE 系统供应商办公室进行 29 项敏感性测试项和 19 项特异性测试项,对荷兰 6 种不同 CPOE 中的药物安全警报质量进行比较评估。对完整测试以及“医嘱内检查”、“患者特异性检查”和“与实验室数据和新患者情况相关的检查”这三个类别计算了敏感性和特异性。对 16 名医院药剂师进行了定性访谈,评估缺失功能和相应的药学检查。
敏感性范围为 0.38 至 0.79,特异性范围为 0.11 至 0.84。系统在敏感性和特异性方面的排名相同。所有系统均存在医嘱内检查和患者特异性检查;由于实验室数据和新患者情况而产生或抑制警报的功能则基本缺失。医院药剂师一致认为,对禁忌症的检查(在 2 个 CPOE 中缺失)和每日剂量方案少于一次的检查(在 4 个 CPOE 中缺失)非常重要。药剂师对其他测试项目的意见则更为分歧。使用了各种药学检查,并制定了临床规则,以解决缺失的功能。
我们的测试显示出功能差异很大,并且具有高度的区分能力。在两个 CPOE 中,基本的临床决策支持功能部分缺失。医院药剂师并非对所有测试项目都认为很重要,并试图通过进行额外的检查和制定临床规则来适应缺失的功能。